Records found and checked by machines, not reviewed by an editor · What this means →

Document · Magazine article

Machines and Man

Machines and Man, by Wassily Leontief. Scientific American 187(3), September 1952, pp. 150–160; doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0952-150.

Issued by
No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
Authors credited
No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Wassily Leontief.
Dates
  • No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 1952-09.
Exact source
  • Machines and Man Scientific American 187(3), September 1952, pp. 150–160; doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0952-150 · published 1952-09 · Publisher article page (paywalled): title, standfirst and bibliographic line only; the article text was not retrieved. Current copy retrieved 2026-10-09. SHA-256 f9161d3789c10d798b9d27dad8762bef7874d09449ea5dad786db5ae180ad24f. Article text not retrieved; only the standfirst on the publisher page. Leontief, W. (1952). Machines and man. Scientific American, 187(3), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0952-150

Appears in

Versions

No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.

Documentary relations

Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.

Bears on · 1

Propositions a passage comes close to without meeting the criterion; each record names what is missing.

  • Machines cheaper than labour at every task: propositions page →

Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.