Debunking Fallacies in the Theory of AI Motivation
A LessWrong post of 5 May 2015 by Richard Loosemore, named as author in the post itself.
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Richard Loosemore.
- Dates
- No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 2015-05-05.
- Exact source
- Debunking Fallacies in the Theory of AI Motivation LessWrong · published 2015-05-05 · Text checked in the post’s first stored version through the LessWrong GraphQL API on 2026-10-06; content version 1.0.0.Archived copy, captured 2019-04-28: Debunking Fallacies in the Theory of AI Motivation. Captured 1454 days after the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2019-04-28. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-06.
Appears in
- Propositions about superintelligence, 1863–2022 →1 record on this document
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Contests · 1
Propositions a passage of this document disputes, or a premise they depend on.
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.