Records found and checked by machines, not reviewed by an editor · What this means →

Document · Technical report

Why we should train AI in space

White paper v1.01 of Lumen Orbit, Inc. (renamed Starcloud in 2025), by Ezra Feilden, Adi Oltean and Philip Johnston, dated September 2024 on its cover. The earliest copy located is an Internet Archive capture of 24 December 2024.

Issued by
Starcloud (formerly Lumen Orbit)
Authors credited
No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Ezra Feilden, Adi Oltean and Philip Johnston.
Dates
Exact source
  • Why we should train AI in space (White Paper v1.01) Lumen Orbit, Inc. (now Starcloud), via lumenorbit.github.io · published 2024-09 · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 90e1bde5b01437d7778e044f8ed95df1c49a63559fc1e35177c94d6443e384f7). PDF v1.01 as served at lumenorbit.github.io/wp.pdf on 2026-10-28; cover line "White Paper v1.01, September 2024". Starcloud's current link (starcloud.com/wp) serves v1.03 (starcloudinc.github.io/wp.pdf), which adds a note that Lumen Orbit was renamed Starcloud in 2025; v1.01 is quoted here. The served file cannot authenticate when the v1.01 bytes were first published. Retrieved again at admission on 2026-10-30 (SHA-256 90e1bde5b01437d7778e044f8ed95df1c49a63559fc1e35177c94d6443e384f7, the same bytes). The cross-family check (2026-10-30) opened the Internet Archive capture linked here and found it byte-identical to this retrieval; a capture shows only what the archive held on its date.Archived copy, captured 2024-12-24: Why we should train AI in space (White Paper v1.01). An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2024-12-24. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-28.

Appears in

Versions

No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.

Issue and authorship records

Documentary relations

Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.

Articulates · 5

Propositions whose criterion a passage of this document meets. The record says what the text states, in its register; it is not evidence that the proposition is true.

Contests · 1

Propositions a passage of this document disputes, or a premise they depend on.

Bears on · 2

Propositions a passage comes close to without meeting the criterion; each record names what is missing.

Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.