Hello, HAL
A magazine article by Colin McGinn, The New York Times Book Review, dated 3 January 1999. The New York Times Book Review, January 3, 1999, as dated on the archive page.
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Colin McGinn.
- Dates
- No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 1999-01-03.
- Exact source
- Hello, HAL The New York Times Book Review (nytimes.com archive), January 3, 1999 · published 1999-01-03 · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-31 (SHA-256 899966e82929aaf5ea0afd23bda22eea816cddb45ae874ea003f94323fcb8aa5). The New York Times archive page of the review dated January 3, 1999, of Kurzweil, Moravec and Gershenfeld; not compared with the printed Book Review.
Appears in
- Machine succession, scale and acceleration: propositions in located texts, 1979–2026 →1 record on this document
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Cited by · 1
Recorded documents that explicitly reference this one. A citation to a work does not identify which version was read.
Contests · 1
Propositions a passage of this document disputes, or a premise they depend on.
- Human minds transferred into machinesMcGinn's review of 1999 of books by Kurzweil, Moravec and Gershenfeld states that the authors take the mind to be essentially a computer, and that uploading into a machine might extinguish consciousness rather than transfer it.1999-01-03 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Human minds transferred into machines: propositions page →
Not recorded for this document: cites · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.