Existential risk from AI and orthogonality: Can we have it both ways?
A journal article by Vincent C. Müller and Michael Cannon, Ratio, dated 2021. The PDF footer reads 'Ratio. 2021;00:1–12' (online publication); accepted 20 June 2021.
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Vincent C. Müller and Michael Cannon.
- Dates
- No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 2021.
- Exact source
- Existential risk from AI and orthogonality: Can we have it both ways? Ratio (Wiley), open-access copy in the White Rose repository (eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/180886); in print in Ratio 35(1), 2022 · published 2021 · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 ed1bee9e49b4e7f8d32df4fbb975f2b77f04136b7d5b996f4303ac07f5335c3b). publisher's open-access PDF as first published online ('Ratio. 2021;00:1–12'); received 17 January 2021, accepted 20 June 2021; the paginated 2022 issue was not compared.
Appears in
- Arguments about catastrophic risk from advanced AI →1 record on this document
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Cited by · 1
Recorded documents that explicitly reference this one. A citation to a work does not identify which version was read.
- AI, orthogonality and the Müller-Cannon instrumental vs general intelligence distinctionHäggström's paper of 14 September 2021 replies to Müller and Cannon's paper of 2021, which it names.2021-09-14 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Häggström, AI, orthogonality and the Müller-Cannon distinction (2021): document page →
Contests · 1
Propositions a passage of this document disputes, or a premise they depend on.
- Orthogonality of intelligence and goalsMüller and Cannon's paper of 2021 argues that the orthogonality thesis requires a notion of instrumental intelligence while the claim of superintelligence beyond human control requires general intelligence, and that no notion of intelligence appears to be both orthogonal to goals and general enough to constitute existential risk.2021 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Orthogonality of intelligence and goals: propositions page →
Not recorded for this document: cites · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.