The Reality of AI and Biorisk
arXiv v1 (2 December 2024). The PDF's arXiv stamp reads "arXiv:2412.01946v1 [cs.AI] 2 Dec 2024"; the paper's own front matter reads "Released as a preprint on December 4, 2024" (`peppin-reality-2024`). The stamp date is used, and the discrepancy is recorded rather than resolved.
- Issued by
- arXiv (from the version record)
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists arXiv (preprint, Aidan Peppin, Anka Reuel, Stephen Casper and others).
- Dates
- Published 2024-12-02
The PDF's arXiv stamp reads "arXiv:2412.01946v1 [cs.AI] 2 Dec 2024"; the paper's own front matter reads "Released as a preprint on December 4, 2024" (`peppin-reality-2024`). The stamp date is used, and the discrepancy is recorded rather than resolved.
- Exact source
- The Reality of AI and Biorisk arXiv (preprint, Aidan Peppin, Anka Reuel, Stephen Casper and others) · publication date unknown · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 6d2a704df6aa7b6d3463a2c9d3451fc1ad92998846d0dfeab24347a1191fd183). arXiv v1 of 2 December 2024 (per the PDF's arXiv stamp; the paper's own front matter reads "Released as a preprint on December 4, 2024") Retrieved again at admission on 2026-10-30 (SHA-256 6d2a704df6aa7b6d3463a2c9d3451fc1ad92998846d0dfeab24347a1191fd183, the same bytes).
Appears in
- Arguments about AI and biological risk →2 records on this document
Versions
peppin-reality-ai-biorisk: 1 recorded version, oldest first, published by arXiv. A version is shown as replacing another only where a record says so. Date order alone never implies it.
- 2024-12-02 · publishedarXiv v1 (2 December 2024) (this version)
This version
Earliest version recorded here; no replacement is recorded.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Articulates · 1
Propositions whose criterion a passage of this document meets. The record says what the text states, in its register; it is not evidence that the proposition is true.
- Published evaluations do not establish real-world biological riskThe preprint "The Reality of AI and Biorisk" (arXiv v1, 2 December 2024) states that existing studies of AI-related biorisk are nascent, often speculative, or limited in methodological maturity and transparency.2024-12-02 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Published evaluations do not establish real-world biological risk: propositions page →
Contests · 1
Propositions a passage of this document disputes, or a premise they depend on.
- Currently available AI systems increase an actor's biological-misuse capabilityThe preprint "The Reality of AI and Biorisk" (arXiv v1, 2 December 2024) states that the available literature does not support the notion that access to biological information and planning through current, publicly available large language models can significantly increase biorisk.2024-12-02 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Currently available AI systems increase an actor's biological-misuse capability: propositions page →
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.