Deceptive Alignment (Risks from Learned Optimization, part 4)
Part 4 of the Risks from Learned Optimization sequence, posted on 5 June 2019 on the Alignment Forum and LessWrong, with the same text as section 4 of arXiv:1906.01820v1.
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Evan Hubinger, Chris van Merwijk, Vladimir Mikulik, Joar Skalse and Scott Garrabrant.
- Dates
- No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 2019-06-05.
- Exact source
- Deceptive Alignment (Risks from Learned Optimization, part 4) Alignment Forum and LessWrong · published 2019-06-05 · Text checked in the post’s first stored version through the LessWrong GraphQL API on 2026-10-06.Archived copy, captured 2019-09-23: Deceptive Alignment (Risks from Learned Optimization, part 4). Captured 110 days after the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2019-09-23. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-06.
Appears in
- Propositions about superintelligence, 1863–2022 →2 records on this document
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Articulates · 2
Propositions whose criterion a passage of this document meets. The record says what the text states, in its register; it is not evidence that the proposition is true.
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.