Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligence
A journal article by Stuart Russell, Daniel Dewey and Max Tegmark, AI Magazine 36, dated 2015. AI Magazine 36(4), Winter 2015, as printed on the PDF pages.
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Stuart Russell, Daniel Dewey and Max Tegmark.
- Dates
- No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 2015.
- Exact source
- Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligence AI Magazine 36(4), Winter 2015, PDF hosted by the Future of Life Institute (futureoflife.org) · published 2015 · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 2789de5108027466521c9c9a0217a1a75897a7dc6b844e09244372349f17258f). AI Magazine version (Winter 2015), as hosted by FLI; an earlier version was attached to the FLI open letter of January 2015.
Appears in
- Arguments about catastrophic risk from advanced AI →1 record on this document
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Bears on · 1
Propositions a passage comes close to without meeting the criterion; each record names what is missing.
- Difficulty of alignmentRussell, Dewey and Tegmark's research-priorities paper of 2015 states that explicitly specifying human preferences in broad domains may not be practical, making it difficult to align the values of powerful AI systems with human values, and that little work has been done on related topics.2015 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Difficulty of alignment: propositions page →
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.