AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0 (人工智能安全治理框架2.0)
Version 2.0 of the AI Safety Governance Framework, a bilingual PDF whose cover names TC260 and CNCERT/CC and is dated September 2025. Its stated measures describe this document, not implementation.
- Issued by
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists 全国网络安全标准化技术委员会 and 国家计算机网络应急技术处理协调中心.
- Dates
- Published 2025-09-15
Released on 15 September 2025 at the National Cybersecurity Awareness Week forum, per the CAC news item; the cover gives only 2025年9月. No effective date is stated.
- Exact source
- 人工智能安全治理框架2.0 全国网络安全标准化技术委员会 (hosted by the Cyberspace Administration of China, cac.gov.cn) · published 2025-09 · Dated document, retrieved on 2026-10-27 (SHA-256 50735b9ca01bff746169fa58e554abb97b4e62c27d4c97afd64f18ff83bba705) directly from the publisher. Version: 1759653474200838.pdf. Bilingual PDF (Chinese text followed by the publisher’s English text) linked from the CAC news item of 15 September 2025. Quotes are from the Chinese text, transcribed as printed: the text layer contains control characters (U+0001) and compatibility forms (Kangxi radicals, ⻛ for 风, ⻅ for 见), which are normalised in the quotations. No copy on tc260.org.cn was located. English title (machine translation): “AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0”. · In Simplified Chinese (zh-Hans)
Appears in
No collection holds a record about this document yet.
Versions
tc260-ai-safety-governance-framework: 3 recorded versions, oldest first, published by National Technical Committee 260 on Cybersecurity of SAC (全国网络安全标准化技术委员会). A version is shown as replacing another only where a record says so. Date order alone never implies it.
This version
Provisions in this version · 5 quoted
A limited selection of quoted provisions: what this edition says about thresholds, required actions, who decides and exceptions. It is not a full summary and says nothing about implementation. A “not found” record states which part of the edition was inspected. It is not a claim that the text was deleted.
Coverage gap. No record yet says which earlier edition, if any, this edition replaced.
Coverage gap. No change from the previous edition is recorded yet. That does not mean nothing changed.
Issue and authorship records
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Explicitly credits · 1
People or institutions this document expressly credits, with the scope stated in each record.
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.