Records found and checked by machines, not reviewed by an editor · What this means →

Document · Journal article

A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity

Warren S. McCulloch and Walter Pitts, “A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity”. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 5, pp. 115-133 (published 1943). The text read is the 1990 reprint; the reprint gives itself as a reprint without stated changes.

Issued by
No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
Authors credited
No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Warren S. McCulloch and Walter Pitts.
Dates
  • No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 1943.
Exact source
  • A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 52(1/2), 1990 (reprint), course copy hosted at cs.cmu.edu · published 1943 · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 6506f2cdcef8d4701bdf238a0f2fa9a40c11f6c0701a6c65e2582a88b7db43d0). 1990 reprint in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 52, pp. 99-115, which states it is reprinted from Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 5, pp. 115-133 (1943); copy on a Carnegie Mellon course page. The 1943 printing itself was not retrieved.

Appears in

No collection holds a record about this document yet.

Versions

No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.

Documentary relations

Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.

Discusses · 1

Concepts explicitly discussed. No earliest use, invention or transmission is claimed.

Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.