Records found and checked by machines, not reviewed by an editor · What this means →

Document · Journal article

Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers

Arthur L. Samuel, “Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers”. IBM Journal of Research and Development 3 (3), pp. 210–229 (published July 1959). Crossref published-print date (published July 1959). Read in a later reprint; the IBM Journal text itself (IEEE Xplore) was not retrieved.

Issued by
No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
Authors credited
No authorship claim recorded yet. The source records list Arthur L. Samuel and A. L. Samuel.
Dates
  • No date claim recorded yet. The source records give the publication date as 1959-07.
Exact source
  • Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers IBM Journal of Research and Development (reprint hosted on an MIT CSAIL personal page) · published 1959-07 · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 210a4e8a61eba7ac079a2ac54c2f81009f36310352d0e4f48bbb1d002d54e1cc). Later reprint, numbered 4.3.3 with printed pp. 535–, in an unidentified collection; it states that the paper was originally published in the IBM Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, July 1959. Scanned PDF with an OCR text layer of uneven quality; quotations avoid garbled passages.
  • Crossref record for DOI 10.1147/rd.33.0210 Crossref REST API (bibliographic index; publisher-deposited metadata) · published 1959-07 · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 86bed5363a7b6962abf756e7ad01ce476f2f1c9ee7228f0ffec80ba8fb8cde48). Index record (JSON) for the IBM Journal article

Appears in

No collection holds a record about this document yet.

Versions

No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.

Documentary relations

Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.

Ideas attributed to this work by · 2

Recorded documents that attribute an argument, concept, term, finding or approach to this one. Each attribution is the citing document’s claim.

Discusses · 1

Concepts explicitly discussed. No earliest use, invention or transmission is claimed.

Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.

Other recorded relations