Records found and checked by machines, not reviewed by an editor · What this means →

Record explorer

Explore the documentary record

Every claim links to its source passage,
its dates where known and its limits.

Institutional dossier

Google Research

Built from the same claims and evidence as the map.

Institutional dossier

The documented history of Google Research: chronology, people, research, capital and compute, and governance. Every statement opens its source and its limits.

Records dated 2017-06-12 to 2026-10-15 · 6 undated

19 claims · 13 sources · 19 not editorially accepted. The counts describe this selection. They do not measure completeness or independent confirmation.

Scope, evidence and limits

Description: Google’s research organisation, within which Brain was described as a team; separately identified in the 2023 announcement.

The records are grouped automatically. No human inspection of the selected claims, source paths or framing is recorded for this dossier. Each source passage shows how it was checked.

The dossier is computed from existing records. It is not a continuous history of the institution, and a missing record does not mean that an event or relationship did not happen. The chronology uses the dates of events and reports, not the date the public could first have known of them. Later sources can describe earlier events.

Select any statement to see its exact claim, qualification, date note, evidence passage, location in the source, source version and review status. The description above is Selekoa’s stored description of the institution, based on these sources:

Connected institutional dossiers

Institutions linked by a documented relationship. Each keeps its own chronology and evidence. When units combine, their earlier records stay separate.

Chronology

Records about the institution itself and documented changes to its frameworks, by year. Expand a year to read the claims. People’s other institutional records and related documents have their own sections. Where a date gives only the year or month, the order within it is unknown.

2017Record year · 5 claims
  1. 2017-06-12 · snapshotpeople

    Record about this institution · Stated in source · Supported

    Qualification and date notes

    An author affiliation on a dated paper; it does not establish a title or tenure.

    arXiv v1 submission date.

  2. 2017-06-12 · snapshotpeople

    Record about this institution · Stated in source · Supported

    Qualification and date notes

    An author affiliation on a dated paper; it does not establish a title or tenure.

    arXiv v1 submission date.

  3. 2017-06-12 · snapshotpeople

    Record about this institution · Stated in source · Supported

    Qualification and date notes

    A paper affiliation; it does not establish a title or dates of employment.

    arXiv v1 submission date; an affiliation snapshot, not an employment interval.

  4. 2017-09-13 · snapshotinstitutions

    Record about this institution · Stated in source · Supported

    Qualification and date notes

    Internal research-team identity, not a separate legal company or an acquisition. No full membership interval is reconstructed.

    Snapshot at the dated source announcement; no employment interval or current appointment is inferred.

  5. 2017-12-06 · snapshotpeople

    Record about this institution · Stated in source · Supported

    Qualification and date notes

    A footnote on a later version; it does not establish a title, tenure or whether he was still at Google in December 2017.

    arXiv v5 date; the footnote refers to when the work was done, without dates. v1 gives no affiliation for him.

2023Record year · 1 claims
  1. 2023-04-20 · snapshotpeople

    Record about this institution · Stated in source · Supported

    Qualification and date notes

    Google Research remains a distinct research unit in the announcement; this remit does not merge it wholesale into Google DeepMind.

    Snapshot at the dated source announcement; no employment interval or current appointment is inferred.