Institutional dossier
The documented history of SecureBio: chronology, people, research, capital and compute, and governance. Every statement opens its source and its limits.
Records dated 2025-07-17 to 2025-07-17 · 0 undated
1 claims · 1 sources · 1 not editorially accepted. The counts describe this selection. They do not measure completeness or independent confirmation.
Scope, evidence and limits
Description: Named in OpenAI's ChatGPT Agent System Card as an external assessor and as the employer of the virologists who performed manual red-teaming. Only what that card states is recorded; no independent description of the organisation was retrieved.
The records are grouped automatically. No human inspection of the selected claims, source paths or framing is recorded for this dossier. Each source passage shows how it was checked.
The dossier is computed from existing records. It is not a continuous history of the institution, and a missing record does not mean that an event or relationship did not happen. The chronology uses the dates of events and reports, not the date the public could first have known of them. Later sources can describe earlier events.
Select any statement to see its exact claim, qualification, date note, evidence passage, location in the source, source version and review status. The description above is Selekoa’s stored description of the institution, based on these sources:
Chronology
Records about the institution itself and documented changes to its frameworks, by year. Expand a year to read the claims. People’s other institutional records and related documents have their own sections. Where a date gives only the year or month, the order within it is unknown.
2025Record year · 1 claims
- OpenAI's ChatGPT Agent System Card reports that two SecureBio virologists carried out about ten hours of manual red-teaming with ChatGPT agent, and that SecureBio also supplied an external assessment within the card's biological evaluations.SecureBio → documented evaluation engagement with → OpenAIInspect claim & evidence ↗
Record about this institution · Stated in source · Supported
Activity: reported performed · System: ChatGPT agent
Qualification and date notes
Reported performed work, as the developer describes it. It does not establish the scope, independence or quality of the work, and the record does not restate any finding of the red-teaming. The passage describing the red teamers' focus and findings is technical content; only the fact and extent of the engagement are quoted.
Dated by the card that reports the work; the card gives no dates for the sessions themselves.