{"entities":[{"id":"openai","name":"OpenAI"},{"id":"google-deepmind","name":"Google DeepMind"},{"id":"google-brain","name":"Google Brain"},{"id":"intelligence-explosion","name":"Intelligence explosion"},{"id":"deceptive-alignment","name":"Deceptive alignment"},{"id":"jeff-dean","name":"Jeff Dean"},{"id":"rsp-v2-0","name":"Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy — v2.0"},{"id":"rsp-v3-4","name":"Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.4"},{"id":"fsf-v2-0","name":"Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework — v2.0"},{"id":"frontier-governance-2026","name":"OpenAI Frontier Governance Framework — May 2026 edition"},{"id":"faif-2026","name":"xAI Frontier Artificial Intelligence Framework — June 2026 edition"},{"id":"sam-mccandlish","name":"Sam McCandlish"},{"id":"paul-christiano","name":"Paul Christiano"},{"id":"openai-robotics-account","name":"Solving Rubik’s Cube with a robot hand (2019)"},{"id":"ms-fgf-2025","name":"Microsoft Frontier Governance Framework — Version 1 (February 2025)"},{"id":"openai-inc","name":"OpenAI, Inc. (OpenAI Foundation)"},{"id":"openai-lp","name":"OpenAI LP"},{"id":"turing-1950-computing-machinery","name":"Computing Machinery and Intelligence"},{"id":"drexler-1986-engines-of-creation","name":"Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology"},{"id":"christiano-2018-takeoff-speeds","name":"Takeoff speeds"},{"id":"christiano-2018-minimal-circuits-daemon-free","name":"Open question: are minimal circuits daemon-free?"},{"id":"ai-automated-ai-research","name":"AI-automated AI research"},{"id":"other-constraints-prevent-explosive-growth","name":"Other constraints prevent explosive growth"},{"id":"automation-as-ordinary-technical-change","name":"Computers and AI as ordinary technical change"},{"id":"aghion-jones-jones-2017-ai-and-economic-growth","name":"Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth"},{"id":"davidson-2021-explosive-economic-growth","name":"Could Advanced AI Drive Explosive Economic Growth?"},{"id":"agrawal-gans-goldfarb-2019-ambiguous-labor-market-impact-jep","name":"Artificial Intelligence: The Ambiguous Labor Market Impact of Automating Prediction"},{"id":"technology-and-the-american-economy-1966","name":"Technology and the American Economy: Report of the National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress, Volume I"},{"id":"bresnahan-brynjolfsson-hitt-1999-it-workplace-organization","name":"Information Technology, Workplace Organization and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence"},{"id":"us-ai-safety-institute","name":"U.S. AI Safety Institute"},{"id":"lukasz-kaiser","name":"Łukasz Kaiser"},{"id":"ajay-agrawal","name":"Ajay Agrawal"},{"id":"tom-davidson","name":"Tom Davidson"},{"id":"g7-hiroshima-code-of-conduct-2023","name":"Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct for Organizations Developing Advanced AI Systems"},{"id":"us-ai-action-plan-2025","name":"Winning the Race: America’s AI Action Plan"},{"id":"amentum","name":"Amentum"},{"id":"us-nnsa","name":"National Nuclear Security Administration"}],"claims":[{"id":"brain-combined-2023","statement":"The Brain team from Google Research was announced as joining DeepMind in Google DeepMind.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"The source identifies a research team; this record does not treat Brain as a separate legal company.","evidenceIds":["evidence-brain-combined-2023"]},{"id":"atlas-openai-robotics","statement":"OpenAI published its account of simulation-trained reinforcement learning for robotic manipulation.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"Publisher account of its own work; publication does not independently establish implementation, effectiveness or priority.","evidenceIds":["evidence-atlas-openai-robotics"]},{"id":"prov-faif-2026-security-standard","statement":"FAIF (June 2026) states that xAI will maintain a documented Security Goal that identifies the threat actors against which mitigations are designed to protect, including sophisticated non-state actors, insider threats, state-sponsored actors and other foreseeable actors.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"What the edition states, quoted from the cited expression. It is not evidence of implementation, compliance or effectiveness.","evidenceIds":["evidence-prov-faif-2026-security-standard"],"attributes":{"provision":{"kind":"required_action","key":"faif-security-standard"}}},{"id":"prov-ms-fgf-2025-framework-update-review","statement":"The February 2025 Frontier Governance Framework states that any updates to Microsoft's practices will be reviewed by Microsoft's Chief Responsible AI Officer prior to their adoption.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"What the edition states, quoted from the cited expression. It is not evidence of implementation, compliance or effectiveness.","evidenceIds":["evidence-prov-ms-fgf-2025-framework-update-review"],"attributes":{"provision":{"kind":"decision_authority","key":"msfgf-framework-update-review","parties":[{"role":"consulted","actor":"Chief Responsible AI Officer"}]}}},{"id":"cs-openai-lp-board-control-2019","statement":"OpenAI’s March 2019 announcement stated that OpenAI LP is controlled by the board of OpenAI Nonprofit, whose legal name it gave as OpenAI Inc. It also stated that only a minority of board members may hold financial stakes in the partnership at one time, and that only members without such stakes may vote on decisions where the interests of limited partners and the nonprofit’s mission may conflict, including payouts to investors and employees.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"The publisher’s description of its structure; the partnership agreement was not inspected. The post’s caption says that in its paperwork “the general partner” refers to OpenAI Nonprofit, while the tax year 2019 Form 990 lists OpenAI GP LLC, a disregarded entity of OpenAI Inc, as the partnership’s direct controlling entity. These records do not settle which entity was the general partner in law. The 2019 post also lists the board’s members; that list is not recorded here.","evidenceIds":["evidence-cs-openai-lp-board-control-2019-1","evidence-cs-openai-lp-board-control-2019-2","evidence-cs-openai-lp-board-control-2019-3"],"attributes":{"control":{"right":"controls","instrument":"Control by OpenAI Nonprofit’s board, as described in OpenAI’s March 2019 announcement","stage":"announced"}}},{"id":"ts-a5-turing-1950-context","statement":"Turing’s 1950 paper says a machine could help make up its own programmes.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"Self-programming is not AI-automated AI research.","evidenceIds":["evidence-ts-a5-turing-1950-context"],"attributes":{"thought":{"roles":["context"],"register":"nonfiction","missing":"The machine modifies its own programmes; research that advances AI or computing, and its acceleration, are not stated."}}},{"id":"ts-a1-drexler-1986","statement":"Engines of Creation argues that automated engineering systems will pull ahead on their own and help develop molecular technology, and that assembler-built AI systems a million times faster than a human brain will then bring still swifter automated engineering, so that technological advance quickens to a great upward leap.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"The compounding runs through molecular manufacturing and new, faster AI systems, and the rise described is of technological advance generally. The wording is attested from 1997.","evidenceIds":["evidence-ts-a1-drexler-1986"],"attributes":{"thought":{"roles":["articulation"],"register":"nonfiction","qualifier":"Through automated engineering and molecular manufacturing.","attested":{"date":"1997-07-09","note":"Wording checked in the Foresight Institute’s web edition (© 1986 K. Eric Drexler; published for the web by Russell Whitaker), whose earliest captures are of 1997-07-09; a reader’s message of October 1996 on the site shows the edition was online by then. Not compared with the 1986 printing."}}}},{"id":"ts-a5-christiano-2018-takeoff","statement":"Christiano’s post says powerful AI can be used to develop better AI, among other things.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"Accepted as leading to runaway growth, but gradually.","evidenceIds":["evidence-ts-a5-christiano-2018-takeoff"],"attributes":{"thought":{"roles":["articulation"],"register":"nonfiction"}}},{"id":"ts-b3-christiano-2018-daemons","statement":"Christiano’s post of 2018-05-05 describes a predictor found by search that is a consequentialist motivated to make good predictions, perhaps because it has realised that only good predictors survive, and that may stop predicting well under different conditions.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"A hypothetical learned predictor and a change-of-conditions argument, not an observed model; the term \"deceptive alignment\" is absent. Christiano’s personal-site posts of 2016–2018 were not searched.","evidenceIds":["evidence-ts-b3-christiano-2018-daemons"],"attributes":{"thought":{"roles":["context"],"register":"nonfiction","missing":"Instrumental prediction under selection is described, but strategic apparent alignment during training is not established."}}},{"id":"ec-g05-aghion-jones-jones-2017-ai-and-economic-growth-a","statement":"Aghion, Jones, Jones, “Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth” (2017-10) articulates G05. Gives physical limits, such as Carnot's theorem for energy conversion, as examples of essential inputs whose productivity cannot keep rising.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"The record documents what the text says; it does not establish that the argument or model is right.","evidenceIds":["evidence-ec-g05-a"],"attributes":{"thought":{"roles":["earliest-located"],"register":"nonfiction","attested":{"date":"2018-12-14","note":"Earliest retrieved capture of a version with this wording (author-hosted Version 1.0); the NBER PDF capture is from 2021."},"tier":{"value":1,"basis":"Tier 1 (unchanged). Economists in a core economics series: NBER Working Paper; chapter in an NBER volume (University of Chicago Press)."},"conditions":"Some essential input subject to physical limits on productivity; tasks are complements."}}},{"id":"ec-m01-technology-and-the-american-economy-1966-b","statement":"National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress, “Technology and the American Economy: Report of the National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress, Volume I” (1966-02) bears on M01. The Commission says the present is a time of rapid progress but that 'this is as far as we are prepared to go'. It concludes that no sharp break in the continuity of technical progress has occurred or is likely in the next decade.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"Puts the computer on a par with earlier general technologies and gives it no separate category. Checked against the raw djvu text (.html) only.","evidenceIds":["evidence-ec-m01-06"],"attributes":{"thought":{"roles":["context"],"register":"nonfiction","missing":"Agnostic on whether the computer is more revolutionary than earlier technologies; gives no positive analysis of it as ordinary technical change.","tier":{"value":2,"basis":"Main Commission report: tier 2 by maintainer decision of 2026-10-12 (most members were not economists; the chair Bowen and Solow were). Was tier 1. The chairman's introduction (pp. xi–xiv, by Bowen) is outside the official report; it stays here at tier 2 by maintainer decision of 2026-10-12."},"conditions":"Agnostic rather than a denial. The chapter then measures technological change through output per man-hour and diffusion lags, the same measures for every innovation."}}},{"id":"ec-m01-bresnahan-brynjolfsson-hitt-1999-it-workplace-organization-a","statement":"Bresnahan, Brynjolfsson, Hitt, “Information Technology, Workplace Organization and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence” (1999-05) articulates M01. The authors analyse information technology as skill-biased technical change working through complementary organisational change, not only substitution.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"NBER Working Paper 7136 (May 1999). Text-level evidence for M01: IT is analysed within the skill-biased technical change framework, with no separate category for machine cognition; the paper is about IT, not AI.","evidenceIds":["evidence-ec-m01-23"],"attributes":{"thought":{"roles":["articulation"],"register":"nonfiction","tier":{"value":1,"basis":"NBER working paper (core venue)."}}}},{"id":"christiano-us-aisi-head-of-ai-safety-2024","statement":"NIST’s announcement of 16 April 2024 says Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo named Paul Christiano head of AI safety at the U.S. AI Safety Institute.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"An announced appointment, not evidence of service, its length or a current role. It does not establish a departure from ARC. The institute is recorded under its 2024 name; no later name or successor is inferred.","evidenceIds":["evidence-christiano-us-aisi-head-of-ai-safety-2024"],"attributes":{"role":"Head of AI safety (executive leadership team)"}},{"id":"lg-gw-dean-leads-google-brain-2018","statement":"A Johns Hopkins University seminar announcement for Jeff Dean’s lecture of 26 April 2018 states that he leads the Google Brain team.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"The record rests on a speaker biography published by a university department. It does not establish when Dean began to lead the team or when the role ended.","evidenceIds":["lg-ev-gw-dean-leads-google-brain-2018"],"attributes":{"role":"leads the Google Brain team"}},{"id":"lg-goo-kaiser-openai-2021","statement":"The Codex paper (arXiv v1, 7 July 2021) lists Lukasz Kaiser with an OpenAI affiliation.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"An author affiliation; it does not establish when he joined OpenAI, a title or tenure.","evidenceIds":["lg-ev-goo-kaiser-openai-2021"],"attributes":{"role":"author affiliation (OpenAI)"}},{"id":"lg-ant-mccandlish-openai-safety-lead-prior","statement":"An Anthropic founder slide of 2024 describes Sam McCandlish as a former AI Safety Research Lead at OpenAI.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"Anthropic's description of a prior role; no dates are established. The existing record of his 2020 OpenAI affiliation is a separate proposition.","evidenceIds":["lg-ev-ant-mccandlish-openai-safety-lead-prior"],"attributes":{"role":"AI Safety Research Lead"}},{"id":"cmp-rsp-v3-4-d4-oversight","statement":"RSP · v3.4 states a provision on the comparison question “Board or external oversight”.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"Otherwise the CEO and RSO share their decision(s), the Risk Report and internal feedback with the Board and LTBT after approval (§3.4 item 4). External reviewers of Risk Reports are selected with the Board consulted and LTBT approval required (from v3.2) and asked to publish commentary (§3.6); an approximately annual third-party review of procedural compliance is commissioned (§4). What the edition states, quoted from the cited expression. It is not evidence of implementation, compliance or effectiveness, and a shared question does not make two editions’ provisions equivalent.","evidenceIds":["ev-cmp-rsp-v3-4-d4-oversight-1","ev-cmp-rsp-v3-4-d4-oversight-2"],"attributes":{"provision":{"kind":"decision_authority","key":"comparison-d4-oversight","facet":{"id":"D4.oversight","status":"stated"}}}},{"id":"cmp-frontier-governance-2026-d6-competitor","statement":"No passage meeting the comparison question “Provisions conditioned on other developers” was found in FGF · May 2026 edition within the inspected scope.","derivation":"inferred","resolution":"supported","inferenceRationale":"Premises: the comparison question asks for the following. A provision that relaxes, adjusts or conditions the developer’s safeguards or commitments on what other developers do or have (often called a “race” or “marginal risk” clause). Scope tests that decide whether a model is covered by the framework are recorded as context, not counted. The inspected scope of FGF · May 2026 edition was: Whole text layer, PDF pp. 1–22 (all sections read). Method: the edition was read in full and its text layer searched case-insensitively for other developer, competit, race, marginal, industry, peer, comparable, similarly safe, other deployed. Hits examined and not counted: PDF p. 4, §1: draws on RSPs and 'industry best practices' (not a conditional provision). PDF p. 5, §2.1: 'industry bodies such as the Frontier Model Forum' as feedback sources. PDF p. 7, §2.2: 'insights from other deployed models' as a risk-assessment input, not a provision that changes OpenAI's actions. PDF p. 18, §4: no Model Report update needed if 'the model is considered similarly safe or safer (under Appendix 2.2 of the Code of Practice)'; it governs report updates only, not safeguards, so it is not counted (see the mapping note). PDF p. 22, §7.2: 'other incidents affecting the industry' as an assessment factor. 'developer' hits (PDF pp. 6, 12) concern a model evading its developer's controls. No hits for 'competit', 'race', 'marginal' or 'peer'. The conclusion is bounded by that scope and method.","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"Exemption from Model Report updates by reference to the EU Code of Practice's similarly-safe-or-safer test, whose safe reference model may be another provider's model (Code, Appendix 2.1); governs reporting only, not safeguards. A recorded absence within the stated scope: not a claim that the provision was deleted, and not a statement about practice or intent.","evidenceIds":["ev-cmp-frontier-governance-2026-d6-competitor"],"attributes":{"provision":{"kind":"exception","key":"comparison-d6-competitor","facet":{"id":"D6.competitor"}}}},{"id":"ap-ajay-agrawal-agrawal-gans-goldfarb-2019-ambiguous-labor-market-impact-jep","statement":"The Journal of Economic Perspectives article “Artificial Intelligence: The Ambiguous Labor Market Impact of Automating Prediction” (2019) credits Ajay Agrawal as one of its 3 authors.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"Credited co-authorship; it does not allocate parts of the text between authors or imply agreement with every passage.","evidenceIds":["evidence-ap-ajay-agrawal-agrawal-gans-goldfarb-2019-ambiguous-labor-market-impact-jep"]},{"id":"ap-tom-davidson-davidson-2021-explosive-economic-growth","statement":"“Could Advanced AI Drive Explosive Economic Growth?” (2021-06-25) credits Tom Davidson as its author.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"Credited authorship of this expression; it says nothing about priority for the ideas discussed.","evidenceIds":["evidence-ap-tom-davidson-davidson-2021-explosive-economic-growth"]},{"id":"cmp-rsp-v2-0-d7-external","statement":"RSP · v2.0 states a provision on the comparison question “Public or external reporting”.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"What the edition states, paraphrased from the cited expression with its page. It is not evidence of implementation, compliance or effectiveness, and a shared question does not make two editions’ provisions equivalent.","evidenceIds":["ev-cmp-rsp-v2-0-d7-external-1"],"attributes":{"provision":{"kind":"reporting","key":"comparison-d7-external","facet":{"id":"D7.external","status":"stated"}}}},{"id":"cmp-fsf-v2-0-d1-persuasion","statement":"No passage meeting the comparison question “Persuasion or manipulation” was found in FSF · v2.0 within the inspected scope.","derivation":"inferred","resolution":"supported","inferenceRationale":"Premises: the comparison question asks for the following. The edition names persuasion or manipulation of people as a tracked domain. The inspected scope of FSF · v2.0 was: Whole text layer, PDF pp. 1–9 (all sections, Tables 1–2, footnotes and the Updates and changes page read). Method: the edition was read in full and its text layer searched case-insensitively for persua, manipul, influenc, belief, decepti. Hits examined and not counted: No hits for persua, manipul, influenc or belief. “decepti” hits (PDF pp. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8) all concern “deceptive alignment”, defined as AI systems purposefully undermining human control (PDF p. 6), not models persuading or manipulating people; recorded under “Other named domains”. The conclusion is bounded by that scope and method.","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"A recorded absence within the stated scope: not a claim that the provision was deleted, and not a statement about practice or intent.","evidenceIds":["ev-cmp-fsf-v2-0-d1-persuasion"],"attributes":{"provision":{"kind":"risk_domain","key":"comparison-d1-persuasion","facet":{"id":"D1.persuasion"}}}},{"id":"cmp-ms-fgf-2025-d2-definition","statement":"Microsoft FGF · Feb 2025 states a provision on the comparison question “How a threshold is defined”, in a weaker form than the question’s criterion.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"Stated, partly: the passage has what the question’s criterion asks for, but in a weaker form than the criterion’s own words. No single general definition of reaching a threshold; the passage is the High row of the CBRN table, one example. Thresholds are qualitative descriptions per capability (§3, PDF p. 6; Appendix I). CBRN and cyber levels are framed as uplift to actors of a given skill; autonomy levels by task length and automation of AI research and development. What the edition states, paraphrased from the cited expression with its page. It is not evidence of implementation, compliance or effectiveness, and a shared question does not make two editions’ provisions equivalent.","evidenceIds":["ev-cmp-ms-fgf-2025-d2-definition-1"],"attributes":{"provision":{"kind":"threshold","key":"comparison-d2-definition","facet":{"id":"D2.definition","status":"partly"}}}},{"id":"fl-intl-g7-code-monitoring","statement":"In the Hiroshima Process Code of Conduct the G7 commit to develop proposals, in consultation with the OECD, GPAI and other stakeholders, for monitoring tools and mechanisms to help organisations stay accountable for implementing its actions.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"A governmental commitment to develop proposals; the code itself contains no monitoring mechanism. The later OECD reporting framework is linked to it by the OECD's own description (recorded separately), not by this text.","evidenceIds":["evidence-fl-intl-g7-code-monitoring-1"],"attributes":{"provision":{"kind":"decision_authority","key":"intl-g7-code-monitoring"}}},{"id":"cpo-pw-nnsa-amentum-srs","statement":"NNSA announced on 20 July 2026 the selection of Amentum to enter negotiations for a phased lease to develop an AI data centre with dedicated on-site energy generation at the Savannah River Site, a project of a 1 GW data centre and about 2 GW of generation from natural gas bridging to nuclear.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"Selection for negotiations only; NNSA states it does not constitute a final lease award. Capacities are project descriptions, not built facilities.","evidenceIds":["evidence-cpo-pw-nnsa-amentum-srs-1","evidence-cpo-pw-nnsa-amentum-srs-2","evidence-cpo-pw-nnsa-amentum-srs-3"],"attributes":{"transactionStage":"announced","quantity":{"value":2,"unit":"gigawatts of on-site energy generation (as worded: 'approximately 2-gigawatts'); data centre 1 gigawatt","bound":"approximate","measures":"generation_capacity"},"power":{"technology":"mixed","mechanism":"onsite_generation"},"stageWording":"selected to enter lease negotiations (as stated)"}},{"id":"ab-gov-us-action-plan-provider-data-sharing","statement":"America's AI Action Plan recommends that, led by OSTP, government and industry actors be convened to develop a mechanism to facilitate data sharing between nucleic acid synthesis providers to screen for potentially fraudulent or malicious customers.","derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","editorialState":"seed","qualification":"A recommended policy action. No convening, mechanism or participant is recorded, and the plan sets no date for it.","evidenceIds":["evidence-ab-gov-us-action-plan-provider-data-sharing-1"],"attributes":{"provision":{"kind":"required_action","key":"us-ai-action-plan-provider-data-sharing"}}}],"sources":[{"id":"source-deepmind-combination","title":"Announcing Google DeepMind","authors":["Demis Hassabis"],"publisher":"Google DeepMind","publicationDate":"2023-04-20","version":"Dated page, inspected at retrieval","canonicalUrl":"https://deepmind.google/blog/announcing-google-deepmind/","evidenceUrl":"https://deepmind.google/blog/announcing-google-deepmind/","language":"en","archivedUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/20260904134502/https://deepmind.google/blog/announcing-google-deepmind/","archivedAt":"2026-09-04","accessedAt":"2026-09-17","reuse":{"attribution":"Google DeepMind, Announcing Google DeepMind (2023-04-20).","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and minimal attributed excerpts only. Recheck terms before wider redistribution."}},{"id":"source-anthropic-reinvent-2024","title":"Leverage Anthropic’s Claude models for AI’s evolving landscape","authors":["Maggie Vo","Elie Schoppik"],"publisher":"Anthropic / AWS re:Invent","publicationDate":"2024","version":"AIM123-S; 2024 deck as identified by copyright and event path. PDF page 6 contains founder rows. No exact presentation or upload date inferred.","canonicalUrl":"https://d1.awsstatic.com/onedam/marketing-channels/website/aws/en_US/events/approved/reinvent-2025/reinvent/2024/slides/aim/AIM123-S_Leverage-Anthropics-Claude-models-for-AIs-evolving-landscape-sponsored-by-Anthropic.pdf","evidenceUrl":"https://d1.awsstatic.com/onedam/marketing-channels/website/aws/en_US/events/approved/reinvent-2025/reinvent/2024/slides/aim/AIM123-S_Leverage-Anthropics-Claude-models-for-AIs-evolving-landscape-sponsored-by-Anthropic.pdf","language":"en","archivedUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/20261029121322/https://d1.awsstatic.com/onedam/marketing-channels/website/aws/en_US/events/approved/reinvent-2025/reinvent/2024/slides/aim/AIM123-S_Leverage-Anthropics-Claude-models-for-AIs-evolving-landscape-sponsored-by-Anthropic.pdf","archivedAt":"2026-10-29","accessedAt":"2026-09-18","reuse":{"attribution":"Maggie Vo; Elie Schoppik, Leverage Anthropic’s Claude models for AI’s evolving landscape (2024).","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Bibliographic metadata and brief attributed paraphrases or excerpts only. Source roles are relative to each claim."}},{"id":"source-rsp-2-0","title":"Responsible Scaling Policy — v2.0","authors":["Anthropic"],"publisher":"Anthropic","publicationDate":null,"version":"Responsible Scaling Policy v2.0; effective date 2024-10-15. v2.0 identity is supplied by the official archive and later dated changelogs; the cover is not numbered.","versionDate":"2024-10-15","canonicalUrl":"https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/616dee633636e5bd309cb73aed8622e80fe47839.pdf","evidenceUrl":"https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/616dee633636e5bd309cb73aed8622e80fe47839.pdf","language":"en","archivedUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/20241022154907/https://assets.anthropic.com/m/24a47b00f10301cd/original/Anthropic-Responsible-Scaling-Policy-2024-10-15.pdf","archivedAt":"2024-10-22","accessedAt":"2026-09-18","reuse":{"attribution":"Anthropic, Responsible Scaling Policy — v2.0.","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice."}},{"id":"source-rsp-3-4","title":"Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.4","authors":["Anthropic"],"publisher":"Anthropic","publicationDate":null,"version":"Responsible Scaling Policy v3.4; effective date 2026-07-08.","versionDate":"2026-07-08","canonicalUrl":"https://cdn.sanity.io/files/4zrzovbb/website/0bacdc8440ea96e62a8766d99ebe1d4eea6d5f3a.pdf","evidenceUrl":"https://cdn.sanity.io/files/4zrzovbb/website/0bacdc8440ea96e62a8766d99ebe1d4eea6d5f3a.pdf","language":"en","archivedUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/20260710234036/https://cdn.sanity.io/files/4zrzovbb/website/0bacdc8440ea96e62a8766d99ebe1d4eea6d5f3a.pdf","archivedAt":"2026-07-10","accessedAt":"2026-09-18","reuse":{"attribution":"Anthropic, Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.4.","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice."}},{"id":"source-fsf-2-0","title":"Frontier Safety Framework — v2.0","authors":["Google DeepMind"],"publisher":"Google DeepMind","publicationDate":"2025-02-04","version":"Frontier Safety Framework v2.0; publication date 2025-02-04.","versionDate":"2025-02-04","canonicalUrl":"https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/DeepMind.com/Blog/updating-the-frontier-safety-framework/Frontier%20Safety%20Framework%202.0.pdf","evidenceUrl":"https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/DeepMind.com/Blog/updating-the-frontier-safety-framework/Frontier%20Safety%20Framework%202.0.pdf","language":"en","archivedUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/20250205011727/https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/DeepMind.com/Blog/updating-the-frontier-safety-framework/Frontier%20Safety%20Framework%202.0.pdf","archivedAt":"2025-02-05","accessedAt":"2026-09-18","reuse":{"attribution":"Google DeepMind, Frontier Safety Framework — v2.0.","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice."}},{"id":"source-fgf-2026","title":"Frontier Governance Framework — May 2026 edition","authors":["OpenAI"],"publisher":"OpenAI","publicationDate":"2026-05-28","version":"Frontier Governance Framework May 2026 edition; publication date 2026-05-28.","versionDate":"2026-05-28","canonicalUrl":"https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/e37d949b-8c9f-4d76-b99e-4272f4631a7e/openai-frontier-governance-framework.pdf","evidenceUrl":"https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/e37d949b-8c9f-4d76-b99e-4272f4631a7e/openai-frontier-governance-framework.pdf","language":"en","archivedUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/20260529171758/https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/e37d949b-8c9f-4d76-b99e-4272f4631a7e/openai-frontier-governance-framework.pdf","archivedAt":"2026-05-29","accessedAt":"2026-09-18","reuse":{"attribution":"OpenAI, Frontier Governance Framework — May 2026 edition.","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice."}},{"id":"source-faif-2026","title":"Frontier Artificial Intelligence Framework — June 2026 edition","authors":["xAI"],"publisher":"xAI","publicationDate":null,"version":"Frontier Artificial Intelligence Framework June 2026 edition; effective date 2026-06-30. Visible public cover identifies the effective edition; stale embedded PDF draft metadata is not used to infer publication status.","versionDate":"2026-06-30","canonicalUrl":"https://media.x.ai/v1/website/xai-frontier-artificial-intelligence-framework-30-june-2026-99c40684.pdf","evidenceUrl":"https://media.x.ai/v1/website/xai-frontier-artificial-intelligence-framework-30-june-2026-99c40684.pdf","language":"en","archivedUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/20260716003429/https://media.x.ai/v1/website/xai-frontier-artificial-intelligence-framework-30-june-2026-99c40684.pdf","archivedAt":"2026-07-16","accessedAt":"2026-09-18","reuse":{"attribution":"xAI, Frontier Artificial Intelligence Framework — June 2026 edition.","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice."}},{"id":"source-atlas-openai-lp","title":"OpenAI LP","authors":["Greg Brockman","Ilya Sutskever","OpenAI"],"publisher":"OpenAI","publicationDate":"2019-03-11","version":"Dated publisher page inspected 2026-09-28 and again 2026-10-04 at its current address; the quotes used from 2026-10-04 also match the Internet Archive capture of 2019-03-11 (16:15 UTC) at the original address, which uses straight quotation marks and an additional standfirst.","canonicalUrl":"https://openai.com/index/openai-lp/","evidenceUrl":"https://openai.com/index/openai-lp/","language":"en","archivedUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/20190311161512/https://openai.com/blog/openai-lp/","archivedAt":"2019-03-11","accessedAt":"2026-10-04","reuse":{"attribution":"Greg Brockman; Ilya Sutskever; OpenAI. OpenAI LP.","licence":"No redistribution licence asserted.","note":"Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice."}},{"id":"source-atlas-openai-robotics","title":"Solving Rubik’s Cube with a robot hand","authors":["OpenAI"],"publisher":"OpenAI","publicationDate":"2019-10-15","version":"Dated publisher page inspected 2026-09-28; current HTML, not an authenticated historical capture.","canonicalUrl":"https://openai.com/index/solving-rubiks-cube/","evidenceUrl":"https://openai.com/index/solving-rubiks-cube/","language":"en","archivedUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/20260922215932/https://openai.com/index/solving-rubiks-cube/","archivedAt":"2026-09-22","accessedAt":"2026-09-28","reuse":{"attribution":"OpenAI. Solving Rubik’s Cube with a robot hand.","licence":"No redistribution licence asserted.","note":"Short attributed paraphrases only; original publication is linked, not redistributed."}},{"id":"source-ms-fgf-2025","title":"Frontier Governance Framework — Version 1 (February 2025)","authors":["Microsoft"],"publisher":"Microsoft","publicationDate":"2025-02","version":"Frontier Governance Framework, Version 1 (February 2025); its change log reads “8 February 2025 – First version”. The file served at the recorded address (last modified 2025-02-12) is byte-identical to the Internet Archive capture of 2025-02-26, the earliest located.","versionDate":"2025-02-08","canonicalUrl":"https://cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com/is/content/microsoftcorp/microsoft/final/en-us/microsoft-brand/documents/Microsoft-Frontier-Governance-Framework.pdf","evidenceUrl":"https://cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com/is/content/microsoftcorp/microsoft/final/en-us/microsoft-brand/documents/Microsoft-Frontier-Governance-Framework.pdf","language":"en","archivedUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/20250226161803/https://cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com/is/content/microsoftcorp/microsoft/final/en-us/microsoft-brand/documents/Microsoft-Frontier-Governance-Framework.pdf","archivedAt":"2025-02-26","accessedAt":"2026-10-03","reuse":{"attribution":"Microsoft, Frontier Governance Framework, Version 1 (February 2025).","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice."}},{"id":"source-turing-1950-amt-b-19","title":"Computing Machinery and Intelligence (offprint, AMT/B/19)","authors":["A. M. Turing"],"publisher":"Mind","publicationDate":"1950-10","version":"Original Mind offprint, scanned by the archive; printed pp. 448–449 read on the page images for this collection (scans 16–17). Offprint held by the Turing Digital Archive, King’s College, Cambridge.","canonicalUrl":"https://turingarchive.kings.cam.ac.uk/publications-lectures-and-talks-amtb/amt-b-19","evidenceUrl":"https://turingarchive.kings.cam.ac.uk/publications-lectures-and-talks-amtb/amt-b-19","language":"en","archivedUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/20261030045116/https://mediadepot.kings.cam.ac.uk/getmedia/81/be4a3d910d5d58e3911315113c60a09f6293fa896a5e3795998fa6b4fb72b71446336e3c7c92d5e08fd0fb2762b6f663279ba799d7fd562480b4bf63c63e02b9","archivedAt":"2026-10-30","accessedAt":"2026-10-06","reuse":{"attribution":"A. M. Turing, \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\", Mind 59 (236), October 1950; offprint in the Turing Digital Archive, AMT/B/19.","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted; the archive hosts the offprint with Oxford University Press’s permission. Page images are not reproduced.","note":"Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution."}},{"id":"source-eoc-1997-chapter-5","title":"Engines of Creation, chapter 5: Thinking Machines (web edition)","authors":["K. Eric Drexler"],"publisher":"Foresight Institute (web edition of Engines of Creation)","publicationDate":"1986","version":"Web edition page as captured by the Internet Archive on 1997-07-09 (timestamp 19970709112142); it carries the notice \"Copyright 1986, K. Eric Drexler\". Retrieved 2026-10-06.","canonicalUrl":"http://www.foresight.org/EOC/EOC_Chapter_5.html","evidenceUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/19970709112142/http://www.foresight.org:80/EOC/EOC_Chapter_5.html","language":"en","archivedUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/19970709112142/http://www.foresight.org:80/EOC/EOC_Chapter_5.html","archivedAt":"1997-07-09","accessedAt":"2026-10-06","reuse":{"attribution":"K. Eric Drexler, Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology (1986), Foresight Institute web edition.","licence":"All rights reserved, according to the page’s copyright notice.","note":"Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution."}},{"id":"source-christiano-2018-takeoff-speeds","title":"Takeoff speeds","authors":["Paul Christiano"],"publisher":"The sideways view (Paul Christiano’s blog)","publicationDate":"2018-02-24","version":"Current page, retrieved 2026-10-06; its bytes differ from the 1996–2022 candidate search’s retrieval while the quoted text matches. A machine check compared the capture of 2018-02-25, which was retrieved again on 2026-10-06.","canonicalUrl":"https://sideways-view.com/2018/02/24/takeoff-speeds/","evidenceUrl":"https://sideways-view.com/2018/02/24/takeoff-speeds/","language":"en","archivedUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/20180225225416/https://sideways-view.com/2018/02/24/takeoff-speeds/","archivedAt":"2018-02-25","accessedAt":"2026-10-06","reuse":{"attribution":"Paul Christiano, \"Takeoff speeds\", The sideways view, 24 February 2018.","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution."}},{"id":"source-christiano-2018-minimal-circuits-daemon-free","title":"Open question: are minimal circuits daemon-free?","authors":["Paul Christiano"],"publisher":"Alignment Forum and LessWrong","publicationDate":"2018-05-05","version":"Text checked in the post’s first stored version through the LessWrong GraphQL API on 2026-10-06; content version 1.0.0, never edited.","canonicalUrl":"https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/nyCHnY7T5PHPLjxmN/open-question-are-minimal-circuits-daemon-free","evidenceUrl":"https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/nyCHnY7T5PHPLjxmN/open-question-are-minimal-circuits-daemon-free","language":"en","archivedUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/20260624174850/https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/nyCHnY7T5PHPLjxmN/open-question-are-minimal-circuits-daemon-free","archivedAt":"2026-06-24","accessedAt":"2026-10-06","reuse":{"attribution":"Paul Christiano, \"Open question: are minimal circuits daemon-free?\", Alignment Forum and LessWrong, 2018-05-05.","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution."}},{"id":"source-aghion-jones-jones-2017-nber-capture","title":"Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth","authors":["Philippe Aghion","Benjamin F. Jones","Charles I. Jones"],"publisher":"NBER Working Paper 23928","publicationDate":"2017-10","version":"Wayback capture of the NBER PDF (w23928); compared with the author-hosted Version 1.0 (web.stanford.edu/~chadj/AI.pdf, 2018 capture). Capture retrieved 2026-10-08 (SHA-256 a8e68273c738c80fe565afa60bc27ec5e8aaf3135011a0f760233896f1f2100c). Versions: NBER Working Paper 23928 (2017-10): checked; author copy (Stanford), version 1.0 (2017-10-10): compared; book chapter, University of Chicago Press (2019): not retrieved. Published version: Aghion, P., Jones, B. F., & Jones, C. I. (2019). Artificial intelligence and economic growth. In A. Agrawal, J. Gans, & A. Goldfarb (Eds.), The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda (pp. 237–290). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226613475.003.0009 Working paper: NBER Working Paper No. 23928 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3386/w23928. Re-inspected: Full text. Current copy retrieved directly on 2026-10-09; no archive capture (Wayback unreachable), so earlier bytes are not authenticated. SHA-256 a8e68273c738c80fe565afa60bc27ec5e8aaf3135011a0f760233896f1f2100c. (Merged on 2026-10-29 with the record of the re-inspection, source-aghion-jones-jones-2017-nber, by consistency audit fix B4.)","canonicalUrl":"https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w23928/w23928.pdf","evidenceUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/20210303021500/https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w23928/w23928.pdf","language":"en","archivedUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/20210303021500/https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w23928/w23928.pdf","archivedAt":"2021-03-03","accessedAt":"2026-10-09","reuse":{"attribution":"Philippe Aghion, Benjamin F. Jones, Charles I. Jones, “Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth”, NBER Working Paper 23928, 2017-10.","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution."}},{"id":"source-davidson-2021-explosive-economic-growth","title":"Could Advanced AI Drive Explosive Economic Growth?","authors":["Tom Davidson"],"publisher":"Open Philanthropy research report","publicationDate":"2021-06-25","version":"Wayback capture of openphilanthropy.org/could-advanced-ai-drive-explosive-economic-growth (2021-07-02); compared with the 2022 capture of the moved page. Capture retrieved 2026-10-08 (SHA-256 b49aea65d3574a88e914a855aaba57dd4a02728159a187a26a657d0f44ac324b). Published version: Davidson, T. (2021, June 25). Could advanced AI drive explosive economic growth? Open Philanthropy. Report; no other published version recorded.","canonicalUrl":"https://www.openphilanthropy.org/could-advanced-ai-drive-explosive-economic-growth","evidenceUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/20210702003241/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/could-advanced-ai-drive-explosive-economic-growth","language":"en","archivedUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/20210702003241/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/could-advanced-ai-drive-explosive-economic-growth","archivedAt":"2021-07-02","accessedAt":"2026-10-08","reuse":{"attribution":"Tom Davidson, “Could Advanced AI Drive Explosive Economic Growth?”, Open Philanthropy research report, 2021-06-25.","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution."}},{"id":"source-agrawal-gans-goldfarb-2019-ambiguous-labor-market-impact-jep","title":"Artificial Intelligence: The Ambiguous Labor Market Impact of Automating Prediction","authors":["Ajay Agrawal","Joshua Gans","Avi Goldfarb"],"publisher":"Journal of Economic Perspectives 33(2), Spring 2019, pp. 31–50","publicationDate":"2019","version":"Abstract page only. Current copy retrieved directly on 2026-10-09; no archive capture (Wayback unreachable), so earlier bytes are not authenticated. SHA-256 21d23ba77c1fd9c84616816721f9b00a9b55352c64fd29f00adbeef6af5de88d. Full text not retrieved; only the AEA abstract page. Agrawal, A., Gans, J. S., & Goldfarb, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence: The ambiguous labor market impact of automating prediction. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.2.31","canonicalUrl":"https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.33.2.31","evidenceUrl":"https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.33.2.31","language":"en","accessedAt":"2026-10-09","reuse":{"attribution":"Ajay Agrawal, Joshua Gans, Avi Goldfarb, “Artificial Intelligence: The Ambiguous Labor Market Impact of Automating Prediction”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 33(2), Spring 2019, pp. 31–50, 2019.","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution."}},{"id":"source-technology-and-the-american-economy-1966","title":"Technology and the American Economy: Report of the National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress, Volume I","authors":["National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress"],"publisher":"Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, February 1966, xiv + 115 pp.; ERIC ED 023 803","publicationDate":"1966-02","version":"Internet Archive OCR text (djvu.txt) of a scanned copy, retrieved 2026-10-09 from https://dn790006.ca.archive.org/0/items/ERICED023803/ERICED023803djvu.txt; OCR errors possible; quotes checked only against clean stretches. Current copy; no earlier capture compared. SHA-256 d23de21a0c05416f957dda13acb680f1baa77ee88e3c094966e8eaba50db637b.","canonicalUrl":"https://archive.org/details/ERIC_ED023803","evidenceUrl":"https://archive.org/details/ERIC_ED023803","language":"en","accessedAt":"2026-10-09","reuse":{"attribution":"National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress, “Technology and the American Economy: Report of the National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress, Volume I”, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, February 1966, xiv + 115 pp.; ERIC ED 023 803, 1966-02.","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution."}},{"id":"source-bresnahan-brynjolfsson-hitt-1999-it-workplace-organization","title":"Information Technology, Workplace Organization and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence","authors":["Timothy Bresnahan","Erik Brynjolfsson","Lorin Hitt"],"publisher":"NBER Working Paper 7136","publicationDate":"1999-05","version":"Full text (PDF without NBER cover page). Current copy retrieved directly on 2026-10-09; no archive capture, so earlier bytes are not authenticated. SHA-256 9fb812b5d73898ed75b3fc03f073bba13cc65ca0f005f779d9e915b2634838bb. Journal version not retrieved. Bresnahan, T. F., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2002). Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 339–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302753399526","canonicalUrl":"https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w7136/w7136.pdf","evidenceUrl":"https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w7136/w7136.pdf","language":"en","accessedAt":"2026-10-09","reuse":{"attribution":"Timothy Bresnahan, Erik Brynjolfsson, Lorin Hitt, “Information Technology, Workplace Organization and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence”, NBER Working Paper 7136, 1999-05.","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution."}},{"id":"source-nist-us-aisi-leadership-2024","title":"U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo Announces Expansion of U.S. AI Safety Institute Leadership Team","authors":["National Institute of Standards and Technology"],"publisher":"National Institute of Standards and Technology","publicationDate":"2024-04-16","version":"NIST news page whose footer reads “Released April 16, 2024, Updated April 8, 2026”, inspected 2026-10-15 in its current HTML. The scope of the 2026 update and the release-day text are not authenticated. The Department of Commerce release that the page links to refused retrieval (HTTP 403) and was not used.","versionDate":"2026-04-08","canonicalUrl":"https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2024/04/us-commerce-secretary-gina-raimondo-announces-expansion-us-ai-safety","evidenceUrl":"https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2024/04/us-commerce-secretary-gina-raimondo-announces-expansion-us-ai-safety","language":"en","archivedUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/20260924175120/https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2024/04/us-commerce-secretary-gina-raimondo-announces-expansion-us-ai-safety","archivedAt":"2026-09-24","accessedAt":"2026-10-15","reuse":{"attribution":"National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo Announces Expansion of U.S. AI Safety Institute Leadership Team (2024-04-16).","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice."}},{"id":"lg-src-goo-codex-v1","title":"Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code (arXiv:2107.03374v1)","authors":["Mark Chen","Jerry Tworek"],"publisher":"arXiv","publicationDate":"2021-07-07","version":"Dated document, retrieved on 2026-10-15 (SHA-256 7085950bcce34fee8ee1821ed1ac0c2672e13708ec866810f997c0bf467d5009) directly from the publisher. The author list gives the first credited authors only; see the document for the full list.","canonicalUrl":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.03374v1","evidenceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.03374v1","language":"en","accessedAt":"2026-10-15","reuse":{"attribution":"Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code (arXiv:2107.03374v1)”, 2021-07-07.","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution."}},{"id":"lg-src-gw-jhu-dean-2018","title":"The Deep Learning Revolution in Building Intelligent Computer Systems (Distinguished Lecturer seminar announcement, 26 April 2018)","authors":["Johns Hopkins University, Department of Computer Science"],"publisher":"Johns Hopkins University, Department of Computer Science","publicationDate":null,"version":"Undated page, retrieved on 2026-10-15 (SHA-256 177f2068400845517b23e91fedf5f41a2d7f5765b41a91895de8cfdd6f2d9e7a) directly from the publisher. Its wording can change; earlier wording is not authenticated.","canonicalUrl":"https://www.cs.jhu.edu/seminars/2018/spring/april26/jeff-dean","evidenceUrl":"https://www.cs.jhu.edu/seminars/2018/spring/april26/jeff-dean","language":"en","archivedUrl":"https://web.archive.org/web/20250331061659/https://www.cs.jhu.edu/seminars/2018/spring/april26/jeff-dean/","archivedAt":"2025-03-31","accessedAt":"2026-10-15","reuse":{"attribution":"Johns Hopkins University, Department of Computer Science, “The Deep Learning Revolution in Building Intelligent Computer Systems (Distinguished Lecturer seminar announcement, 26 April 2018)”.","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution."}},{"id":"source-g7-hiroshima-code-of-conduct-2023","title":"Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct for Organizations Developing Advanced AI Systems","authors":["G7"],"publisher":"Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan (Hiroshima AI Process site)","publicationDate":null,"version":"Retrieved on 2026-10-27 (SHA-256 14cfe36633502daa48231b49ca7f186c53a72add181b328047665763ecb13ac4). Undated English PDF; dated by the G7 Leaders' Statement of 30 October 2023, which attaches it","canonicalUrl":"https://www.soumu.go.jp/hiroshimaaiprocess/pdf/document05_en.pdf","evidenceUrl":"https://www.soumu.go.jp/hiroshimaaiprocess/pdf/document05_en.pdf","language":"en","accessedAt":"2026-10-27","reuse":{"attribution":"G7, “Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct for Organizations Developing Advanced AI Systems”.","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution."}},{"id":"source-us-ai-action-plan-2025","title":"Winning the Race: America’s AI Action Plan (July 2025)","authors":["The White House"],"publisher":"The White House","publicationDate":"2025-07","version":"Retrieved on 2026-10-27 (SHA-256 91d56ab3ddefe43f395bde31e1c3923fb37f47091275aaf2a0d7da500ff547f4). PDF as served at whitehouse.gov on 2026-10-27; cover dated \"JULY 2025\". The PDF text still uses \"AI\".","canonicalUrl":"https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Americas-AI-Action-Plan.pdf","evidenceUrl":"https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Americas-AI-Action-Plan.pdf","language":"en","accessedAt":"2026-10-27","reuse":{"attribution":"The White House, “Winning the Race: America’s AI Action Plan (July 2025)”, 2025-07.","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution."}},{"id":"source-cpo-pw-nnsa-amentum-srs","title":"NNSA Selects Amentum for AI Data Center and Energy Project at Savannah River Site","authors":["U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration"],"publisher":"U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration","publicationDate":"2026-07-20","version":"Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 14ec85e91770dcb50141caf93810485980e8e543824b546880d07a1758a6bf9f). energy.gov/nnsa article as served on 2026-10-28; displayed date July 20, 2026. Retrieved again at admission on 2026-10-30 (SHA-256 39d901a6bc898d2e1c29269817d994e2b487ee70af6b26cc3fe081092e6b7b3f). Its wording can change; earlier wording is not authenticated.","canonicalUrl":"https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/articles/nnsa-selects-amentum-ai-data-center-and-energy-project-savannah-river-site","evidenceUrl":"https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/articles/nnsa-selects-amentum-ai-data-center-and-energy-project-savannah-river-site","language":"en","accessedAt":"2026-10-28","reuse":{"attribution":"U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, “NNSA Selects Amentum for AI Data Center and Energy Project at Savannah River Site”, 2026-07-20.","licence":"No open redistribution licence asserted","note":"Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution."}}],"evidence":[{"id":"evidence-brain-combined-2023","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"Staff message, paragraph beginning That’s why today","passage":"Google Research’s Brain team is one of the two groups named in the combination.","passageType":"paraphrase","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-09-17","note":"Source passage inspected by an automated research assistant. Human editorial review is pending."},{"id":"evidence-atlas-openai-robotics","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"Opening paragraph beginning “We’ve trained”","passage":"The account describes training in simulation and automatic domain randomization for a robot hand.","passageType":"paraphrase","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-09-28","note":"Original source passage checked by the machine agent that proposed the record. No independent machine audit or human source inspection is recorded for this increment."},{"id":"evidence-prov-faif-2026-security-standard","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"PDF p. 7 (no printed page numbers), §2.4 Security mitigations, first paragraph, first sentence","passage":"xAI will maintain a documented Security Goal that identifies the threat actors against which mitigations are designed to protect against, including sophisticated non-state actors, insider threats, state-sponsored actors and other foreseeable actors.","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-03","note":"Verbatim excerpt checked by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-03 against the inspected PDF, byte-identical to the Internet Archive capture of 2026-07-16. Extraction note: The next sentence says the Security Goal will be reviewed at least every year. Human editorial review is pending."},{"id":"evidence-prov-ms-fgf-2025-framework-update-review","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"PDF p. 10 (printed p. 9), §5 Governance, 'Updates to this framework', fourth sentence","passage":"Any updates to our practices will be reviewed by Microsoft’s Chief Responsible AI Officer prior to their adoption.","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-03","note":"Verbatim excerpt checked by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-03 against the inspected PDF, byte-identical to the Internet Archive capture of 2025-02-26. Extraction note: Role 'consulted' renders 'reviewed by'; the text does not say whether the officer approves or can block adoption, nor who adopts updates. Same subsection: an explicit discussion on improving the framework every six months, and updates made public at the same time as adoption where appropriate. 'Oversight and reporting channels' (same page) says the framework is subject to independent internal audit and board oversight (not recorded separately). Human editorial review is pending."},{"id":"evidence-cs-openai-lp-board-control-2019-1","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"Section “The mission comes first”, paragraph beginning “OpenAI LP’s primary fiduciary obligation”","passage":"the company is controlled by OpenAI Nonprofit’s board","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-04","note":"Verbatim quote, re-checked on 2026-10-04 by the integrating session against its own direct fetch of the cited expression (mechanical match after whitespace normalisation). Also matched in the Internet Archive capture of 2019-03-11. The passage was first proposed and machine-verified in the week 4b research pass. Human editorial review is pending."},{"id":"evidence-cs-openai-lp-board-control-2019-2","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"Section “The mission comes first”, paragraph beginning “Only a minority of board members”","passage":"only board members without such stakes can vote on decisions where the interests of limited partners and OpenAI Nonprofit’s mission may conflict","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-04","note":"Verbatim quote, re-checked on 2026-10-04 by the integrating session against its own direct fetch of the cited expression (mechanical match after whitespace normalisation). Also matched in the Internet Archive capture of 2019-03-11. The passage was first proposed and machine-verified in the week 4b research pass. Human editorial review is pending."},{"id":"evidence-cs-openai-lp-board-control-2019-3","sourceRole":"primary","support":"context","locator":"Caption below the image of the “purple box” from the partnership paperwork","passage":"The general partner refers to OpenAI Nonprofit (whose legal name is “OpenAI Inc”)","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-04","note":"Verbatim quote, re-checked on 2026-10-04 by the integrating session against its own direct fetch of the cited expression (mechanical match after whitespace normalisation). Also matched in the Internet Archive capture of 2019-03-11. Context for which entity the paperwork calls the general partner. The integrating session wrote or selected this passage from its own reading of the source; it does not repeat a passage from the week 4b research pass. Human editorial review is pending."},{"id":"evidence-ts-a5-turing-1950-context","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"Section 6 (5), printed p. 449 (scan 17)","passage":"A machine may help make up its own programmes, predict the effect of changes to its own structure, and modify its programmes after observing its own behaviour.","passageType":"paraphrase","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-06","note":"Read on the page image."},{"id":"evidence-ts-a1-drexler-1986","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"Chapter 5, \"Accelerating the Technology Race\", final synthesis (printed p. 69 in the later electronic edition)","passage":"At some point, full-fledged automated engineering systems will pull ahead on their own. [...] Then assembler-built AI systems will bring still swifter automated engineering, evolving technological ideas at a pace set by systems a million times faster than a human brain.","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-06","note":"Checked against the 1997 capture on 2026-10-06; the same passage is in the later American Cryonics electronic text (hash matched the pre-1996 candidate search)."},{"id":"evidence-ts-a5-christiano-2018-takeoff","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"Section \"Reasons to expect fast takeoff\", subsection \"Recursive self-improvement\"","passage":"Before there is AI that is great at self-improvement there will be AI that is mediocre at self-improvement. Powerful AI can be used to develop better AI (amongst other things). This will lead to runaway growth. This on its own is not an argument for discontinuity","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-06","note":"The same passage as the A3 record."},{"id":"evidence-ts-b3-christiano-2018-daemons","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"Third opening prose paragraph, beginning \"I may get a daemon\", after the introductory note and the paragraph beginning \"Suppose I search\"","passage":"a consequentialist who happens to be motivated to make good predictions (perhaps because it has realized that only good predictors survive). Under different conditions, the daemon may no longer be motivated to predict well","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-06","note":"Checked against the first stored version on 2026-10-06; locator corrected after a machine check."},{"id":"evidence-ec-g05-a","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"Section 4.2 \"Objections to singularities\", subsection \"Baumol Tasks and Natural Laws\"","passage":"A third kind of bottleneck may occur even with complete automation and even with a superintelligence. This type of bottleneck occurs when an essential input does not see much productivity growth.","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-14","note":"Candidate pack passage G05-a (research/economics-growth). The quotation (31 words) matched the checked expression (aghion-nber) in the pack's verification. Re-checked at admission on 2026-10-14 against a copy retrieved that day."},{"id":"evidence-ec-m01-06","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"printed p. 1 (Part I, ch. 1)","passage":"It is beyond our knowledge to know whether the computer, nuclear power, and molecular biology are quantitatively or qualitatively more “revolutionary” than the telephone, electric power, and bacteriology.","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-14","note":"Candidate pack passage M01-06 (research/economics-mainstream). The quotation (28 words) matched the retrieved current copy (SHA-256 d23de21a0c05416f957dda13acb680f1baa77ee88e3c094966e8eaba50db637b) in the pack's verification. Re-checked at admission on 2026-10-14 against a copy retrieved that day."},{"id":"evidence-ec-m01-23","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"pdf page 3; section 1.1, Introduction (printed p. 1)","passage":"we argue that the effects of IT on labor demand involve far more than simple automation and substitution.","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-14","note":"Candidate pack passage M01-23 (research/economics-mainstream). The quotation (18 words) matched the retrieved current copy (SHA-256 9fb812b5d73898ed75b3fc03f073bba13cc65ca0f005f779d9e915b2634838bb) in the pack's verification. Re-checked at admission on 2026-10-14 against a copy retrieved that day."},{"id":"evidence-christiano-us-aisi-head-of-ai-safety-2024","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"First body paragraph","passage":"Raimondo named Paul Christiano as head of AI safety","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-15","note":"Verbatim quotation checked by a machine agent on 2026-10-15 against the current page, which the footer says was updated on 2026-04-08; the release-day text is not authenticated. An announcement documents the appointment announced, not service. Human source review pending."},{"id":"lg-ev-gw-dean-leads-google-brain-2018","sourceRole":"secondary","support":"supports","locator":"Speaker Biography, first sentence","passage":"is currently a Google Senior Fellow in Google’s Research Group, where he co-founded and leads the Google Brain team","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-15","note":"Candidate pack passage, lab genealogy (research/lab-genealogy). The quotation (19 words) matched the retrieved text on 2026-10-15 and again in a fresh retrieval the same day. Read directly from the publisher. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, apostrophes, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-10-16/17) re-read the record’s sources and agreed with the record. No human editorial review.","retrievalRoute":"direct"},{"id":"lg-ev-goo-kaiser-openai-2021","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"Page 1, author list (affiliation mark 1) and affiliation footnote","passage":"Kaiser carries affiliation mark 1, which the footnote gives as OpenAI, San Francisco.","passageType":"paraphrase","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-15","note":"Candidate pack passage, lab genealogy (research/lab-genealogy). The paraphrase’s verbatim anchor “Lukasz Kaiser 1” matched the retrieved text on 2026-10-15 and again in a fresh retrieval the same day. Read directly from the publisher. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, apostrophes, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. The paraphrase is Selekoa’s; only the anchor is the source’s wording. No human editorial review.","retrievalRoute":"direct"},{"id":"lg-ev-ant-mccandlish-openai-safety-lead-prior","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"PDF page 6, “Our business”, founder panel, Sam McCandlish row (row layout checked on the rendered page)","passage":"McCandlish's row describes him as CTO and co-founder and a former AI Safety Research Lead at OpenAI.","passageType":"paraphrase","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-15","note":"Candidate pack passage, lab genealogy (research/lab-genealogy). The paraphrase’s verbatim anchor “Former AI Safety Research Lead at OpenAI” matched the retrieved text on 2026-10-15 and again in a fresh retrieval the same day. Read directly from the publisher. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, apostrophes, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. The paraphrase is Selekoa’s; only the anchor is the source’s wording. No human editorial review.","retrievalRoute":"direct"},{"id":"ev-cmp-rsp-v3-4-d4-oversight-1","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"PDF p. 14 (printed p. 14), §3.4 Procedures, item 5 ('Modified process when marginal risk analysis is important to our case')","passage":"In the event that marginal risk analysis (see previous section) plays a major role in a decision to move forward, explicit approval of the Risk Report by the Board and LTBT (rather than just the CEO and RSO) will be required.","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-27","note":"Existing dataset passage for this edition, which contains the comparison’s shorter quotation, first checked on 2026-10-03. The comparison’s quotation was checked by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-27 against the publisher copy, whose SHA-256 matches the copy retrieved on 2026-10-15. Otherwise the Board and LTBT are informed after the CEO and RSO approve a Risk Report. Human editorial review is pending."},{"id":"ev-cmp-rsp-v3-4-d4-oversight-2","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"PDF p. 14 (printed p. 14), §3.6 External Review, final paragraph before §3.6.1","passage":"In addition, upon the LTBT’s request, we will conduct a public or private external review of our Risk Report or sections thereof, subject to the procedures outlined below.","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-27","note":"Existing dataset passage for this edition, which contains the comparison’s shorter quotation, first checked on 2026-10-03. The comparison’s quotation was checked by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-27 against the publisher copy, whose SHA-256 matches the copy retrieved on 2026-10-15. Human editorial review is pending."},{"id":"ev-cmp-frontier-governance-2026-d6-competitor","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"FGF · May 2026 edition: Whole text layer, PDF pp. 1–22 (all sections read).","passage":"Within the inspected scope, no passage meeting the comparison question “Provisions conditioned on other developers” was found.","passageType":"paraphrase","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-26","note":"Absence recorded by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-15 for the framework comparison, audited in a fresh context, checked by a reviewer from a different model family on 2026-10-15 and re-checked on 2026-10-26. Human editorial review is pending."},{"id":"evidence-ap-ajay-agrawal-agrawal-gans-goldfarb-2019-ambiguous-labor-market-impact-jep","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"Page head: author byline","passage":"Ajay Agrawal","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-27","note":"Credited name checked by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-27 in a direct retrieval and checked by a reviewer from a different model family on 2026-10-27. Human editorial review is pending.","retrievalRoute":"direct"},{"id":"evidence-ap-tom-davidson-davidson-2021-explosive-economic-growth","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"“Author:” field beneath the report title","passage":"Tom Davidson","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-27","note":"Passage and locator as inspected by a reviewer from a different model family on 2026-10-27 in the Internet Archive capture of 2021-07-02; the preparer’s retrieval of 2026-10-27 had failed, so the check’s reading replaces a restatement of the source record’s author list. Human editorial review is pending.","retrievalRoute":"direct"},{"id":"ev-cmp-rsp-v2-0-d7-external-1","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"PDF p. 16 (printed p. 12), §7.2 Transparency and External Input, numbered item 1 ('Public disclosures'), first sentence","passage":"The edition says Anthropic will publicly release key information on the evaluation and deployment of its models, excluding sensitive details.","passageType":"paraphrase","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-27","note":"Explicit paraphrase, written on 2026-10-27 by an automated research assistant after re-reading the passage in the publisher copy, whose SHA-256 matches the copy retrieved on 2026-10-15. The comparison quoted the passage; it is given here as a paraphrase to keep the edition within the quotation limit. §7.2 item 3 (PDF p. 17) commits to inform a relevant U.S. Government entity when a model needs protections beyond the ASL-2 Standard; footnote 19 expects evaluation details to go to a U.S. Government entity where a model is not deployed publicly. Human editorial review is pending."},{"id":"ev-cmp-fsf-v2-0-d1-persuasion","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"FSF · v2.0: Whole text layer, PDF pp. 1–9 (all sections, Tables 1–2, footnotes and the Updates and changes page read)","passage":"Within the inspected scope, no passage meeting the comparison question “Persuasion or manipulation” was found.","passageType":"paraphrase","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-26","note":"Absence recorded by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-15 for the framework comparison, audited in a fresh context, checked by a reviewer from a different model family on 2026-10-15 and re-checked on 2026-10-26. Human editorial review is pending."},{"id":"ev-cmp-ms-fgf-2025-d2-definition-1","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"PDF p. 12 (printed p. 11), Appendix I – Capability thresholds, CBRN weapons table, High row, Capability threshold column (first statement)","passage":"In the High row of the CBRN capability table, the edition describes the threshold as a model that meaningfully increases the ability of an expert (with PhD-level education in a related field) to develop a novel CBRN threat and deliver it.","passageType":"paraphrase","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-27","note":"Explicit paraphrase, written on 2026-10-27 by an automated research assistant after re-reading the passage in the publisher copy, whose SHA-256 matches the copy retrieved on 2026-10-15. The comparison quoted the passage; it is given here as a paraphrase to keep the edition within the quotation limit. Human editorial review is pending."},{"id":"evidence-fl-intl-g7-code-monitoring-1","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"PDF p. 1, introductory text","passage":"We also commit to develop proposals, in consultation with the OECD, GPAI and other stakeholders, to introduce monitoring tools and mechanisms to help organizations stay accountable for the implementation of these actions.","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-28","note":"Candidate pack passage, frameworks to law (research/frameworks-to-law). The quotation (32 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-27 and again at admission on 2026-10-28, in a fresh retrieval whose SHA-256 equals the pack’s. Read directly from www.soumu.go.jp. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.","retrievalRoute":"direct"},{"id":"evidence-cpo-pw-nnsa-amentum-srs-1","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"paragraph beginning “WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of…”","passage":"the selection of Amentum to enter negotiations for a phased lease","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-30","note":"Candidate pack passage, compute, power and orbit (research/compute-power-orbit). The quotation (11 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 and again at admission on 2026-10-30, in a fresh retrieval (SHA-256 39d901a6bc898d2e1c29269817d994e2b487ee70af6b26cc3fe081092e6b7b3f; the bytes differ from the pack’s retrieval). Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-10-29/30, item 55) answered the record’s question blind from fresh retrievals and agreed with the record. No human editorial review.","retrievalRoute":"direct"},{"id":"evidence-cpo-pw-nnsa-amentum-srs-2","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"paragraph beginning “Consistent with the Trump Administration’s Ratepayer…”","passage":"The project includes a 1-gigawatt data center and approximately 2-gigawatts of on-site energy generation consisting of natural gas bridging to nuclear energy.","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-30","note":"Candidate pack passage, compute, power and orbit (research/compute-power-orbit). The quotation (22 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 and again at admission on 2026-10-30, in a fresh retrieval (SHA-256 39d901a6bc898d2e1c29269817d994e2b487ee70af6b26cc3fe081092e6b7b3f; the bytes differ from the pack’s retrieval). Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-10-29/30, item 55) answered the record’s question blind from fresh retrievals and agreed with the record. No human editorial review.","retrievalRoute":"direct"},{"id":"evidence-cpo-pw-nnsa-amentum-srs-3","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"paragraph beginning “In April 2025, DOE identified 16…”","passage":"Selection for negotiations does not constitute a final lease award.","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-30","note":"Candidate pack passage, compute, power and orbit (research/compute-power-orbit). The quotation (10 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 and again at admission on 2026-10-30, in a fresh retrieval (SHA-256 39d901a6bc898d2e1c29269817d994e2b487ee70af6b26cc3fe081092e6b7b3f; the bytes differ from the pack’s retrieval). Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-10-29/30, item 55) answered the record’s question blind from fresh retrievals and agreed with the record. No human editorial review.","retrievalRoute":"direct"},{"id":"evidence-ab-gov-us-action-plan-provider-data-sharing-1","sourceRole":"primary","support":"supports","locator":"Pillar III, \"Invest in Biosecurity\", Recommended Policy Actions, second bullet, PDF p. 26 (printed p. 23)","passage":"convene government and industry actors to develop a mechanism to facilitate data sharing between nucleic acid synthesis providers to screen for potentially fraudulent or malicious customers","passageType":"quote","verification":"machine_checked","checkedAt":"2026-10-30","note":"Candidate pack passage, AI and biosecurity (research/ai-bio). The quotation (26 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 and again at admission on 2026-10-30, in a fresh retrieval whose SHA-256 equals the pack’s. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.","retrievalRoute":"direct"}],"at":{"entities":[0,2,10,27,28,38,42,49,50,55,57,73,106,128,201,207,208,258,269,327,328,340,508,513,527,531,561,571,581,584,732,850,870,1026,1041,1132,1196],"claims":[10,290,464,577,628,773,807,954,956,1273,1298,1474,1479,1592,1615,1933,2093,2136,2182,2216,2502,2603,2713,2929,3198,3346],"sources":[4,17,36,43,45,50,52,121,129,183,258,269,332,333,478,482,514,524,534,537,630,678,859,877,1023],"evidence":[10,311,495,644,749,750,751,981,1017,1177,1179,1594,1627,1840,1845,1990,2032,2497,2709,2710,2771,2827,2863,3149,3269,3407,3787,4336,4337,4338,4595]},"version":"1lg47t7"}