{"entities":[{"id":"rosenfelder-1992-real-life-turing-test","shortName":"Rosenfelder, Real-life Turing test (1992)","type":"document"},{"id":"franzen-1992-real-life-turing-test-reply","shortName":"Franzen, Re: Real-life Turing test (1992)","type":"document"},{"id":"mccullough-1992-real-life-turing-test-reply","shortName":"McCullough, Re: Real-life Turing Test (1992)","type":"document"},{"id":"mark-rosenfelder","name":"Mark Rosenfelder","type":"person"}],"claims":[{"id":"ts-c1-rosenfelder-1992","subject":"rosenfelder-1992-real-life-turing-test","predicate":"articulates_proposition","object":{"kind":"entity","entityId":"behavioural-tests-as-evidence"},"topic":"ideas","statement":"Rosenfelder’s 1992 message offers the restricted-topic Loebner competition in Boston, where, the message says, five of ten judges took a program for human, as food for thought for those who think the Turing test sufficient.","time":{"kind":"event","date":"1992-02-10","basis":"publication","note":"Date header 10 Feb 92 23:52:21 GMT; the Message-ID agrees."},"derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","attributes":{"thought":{"roles":["articulation"],"register":"nonfiction"}}},{"id":"ts-c1-franzen-1992-contests","subject":"franzen-1992-real-life-turing-test-reply","predicate":"contests_proposition","object":{"kind":"entity","entityId":"behavioural-tests-as-evidence"},"topic":"ideas","statement":"Franzen’s 1992 reply says people often infer understanding from sparse or vacuous responses, and that a Turing test is only a test when conducted by someone who knows what they are doing.","time":{"kind":"event","date":"1992-02-11","basis":"publication","note":"Date header 11 Feb 92 10:29:03 GMT; the reply cites Rosenfelder’s message of 10 February."},"derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","attributes":{"thought":{"roles":["contesting"],"register":"nonfiction","qualifier":"Disputes the inference from a badly run test to the insufficiency of a competent one.","engagement":{"kind":"engages-premise","rationale":"Gives a reason against the premise that the competition’s result shows behavioural tests to be misleading: a test conducted by people who do not know what they are doing is not the test."}}}},{"id":"ts-c1-mccullough-1992-contests","subject":"mccullough-1992-real-life-turing-test-reply","predicate":"contests_proposition","object":{"kind":"entity","entityId":"behavioural-tests-as-evidence"},"topic":"ideas","statement":"McCullough’s 1992 reply denies that the Boston competition was a serious conversation test, and argues that the judges who were not fooled show that humans and computers could be distinguished by behavioural tests.","time":{"kind":"event","date":"1992-02-14","basis":"publication","note":"Date header Fri, 14 Feb 1992 18:57:49 GMT; the Message-ID agrees."},"derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported","attributes":{"thought":{"roles":["contesting"],"register":"nonfiction","qualifier":"The split among judges is offered as evidence that behavioural tests can still tell machines apart.","engagement":{"kind":"engages-premise","rationale":"Gives a reason against the premise that the competition shows behavioural tests cannot tell machines from people: the judges who were not fooled show that the two could be distinguished."}}}},{"id":"ap-mark-rosenfelder-rosenfelder-1992-real-life-turing-test","subject":"mark-rosenfelder","predicate":"authored","object":{"kind":"entity","entityId":"rosenfelder-1992-real-life-turing-test"},"topic":"ideas","statement":"The mailing-list message “Real-life Turing test” (1992-02-10) is sent under the name Mark Rosenfelder.","time":{"kind":"event","date":"1992-02-10","basis":"publication","note":"Date the source record gives for this text; authorship is credited in the inspected expression."},"derivation":"explicit","resolution":"supported"}],"sources":[],"evidence":[],"at":{"entities":[276,277,278,916],"claims":[829,830,831,2318],"sources":[],"evidence":[]},"version":"1lg47t7"}