Claim and evidence Close ×
The preprint of 6 June 2023 states that promising nonproliferation measures include pre-release evaluations of language models by third parties, curation of training datasets, and verifiable screening of all DNA generated by synthesis providers. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Subject version arXiv v1 (6 June 2023) · Published 2023-06-06 · Effective date not established Date 2023-06-06 · publication Role Context Register (kind of text) Nonfiction Scope of the passage Screening is one of three measures the preprint proposes, not a sole control point. Missing element The passage proposes screening among three promising measures; it does not state that mitigation of AI-related biological risk depends on screening, which is the proposition’s criterion. Scope and limits The record documents what this preprint proposes; it is not evidence that screening is effective, that any provider screens, or that the proposition is true. It holds no earliest-located role: the passage does not meet the proposition’s criterion. Downgraded at admission from the role the pack gave it, on the cross-family check of 2026-10-30: the passage does not meet the proposition’s criterion as worded. The record keeps the passage and says what it lacks. (item 98). The abstract's other sentences name specific technical and ordering content. Only the measures sentence is cited; that content was excluded and is not paraphrased.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Can large language models democratize access to dual-use biotechnology? ↗ arXiv (preprint, Emily H. Soice, Rafael Rocha, Kimberlee Cordova, Michael Specter, Kevin M. Esvelt) · Publication date unknown
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “Promising nonproliferation measures include pre-release evaluations of LLMs by third parties, curating training datasets to remove harmful concepts, and verifiably screening all DNA generated by synthesis providers” Location in source Abstract, PDF p. 1 (final sentence)
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-10-30
Source details and check notes Authors arXiv (preprint, Emily H. Soice, Rafael Rocha, Kimberlee Cordova, Michael Specter, Kevin M. Esvelt) Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 78647f96bb8fed0e988de8807caa503cebd4b1148f47ad9d518b9cc401a2bbfe). arXiv v1 of 6 June 2023 (PDF at /pdf/2306.03809v1) Retrieved again at admission on 2026-10-30 (SHA-256 78647f96bb8fed0e988de8807caa503cebd4b1148f47ad9d518b9cc401a2bbfe, the same bytes). Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-28 Language English (en) Attribution arXiv (preprint, Emily H. Soice, Rafael Rocha, Kimberlee Cordova, Michael Specter, Kevin M. Esvelt), “Can large language models democratize access to dual-use biotechnology?”. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, AI and biosecurity (research/ai-bio). The quotation (27 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 and again at admission on 2026-10-30, in a fresh retrieval whose SHA-256 equals the pack’s. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. Quotation stops before the clause naming further facilities; the preprint is the primary source for its own proposal. A cross-family machine check (2026-10-30, item 98) re-read the record’s sources and found partial support; its corrections were applied at admission. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document bears on the proposition without meeting its criterion; the record names the missing element. It is not an articulation and implies no influence.
Date. Date of the arXiv v1 submission, the expression quoted.
Record ID ab-arg-d5-soice-context