Claim · 2021-10-07 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

Kryshtafovych et al. (Proteins, 7 October 2021) state that CASP14 participants tested 215 modeling methods and submitted over 67,000 predictions in six prediction categories, and that structures of 52 proteins and protein–protein complexes were received from the experimental community in time for the assessments.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Critical Assessment of Methods of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP) – Round XIV → states provision → CASP14 participation and target numbers as stated by the organisers

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

Critical Assessment of Methods of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP) – Round XIVstates provision ↓CASP14 participation and target numbers as stated by the organisers

Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editorStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Statement · provision ID mod-casp14-participation
Date: 2021-10-07 · publication Records dated 2021 →

Scope and limitsCounts as the organisers state them; not independently checked here.

The evidence 02

primary sourceSupports the claim

Critical Assessment of Methods of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP) – Round XIV

Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics (author manuscript in PubMed Central) · 2021-10-07

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“tested 215 modeling methods and submitted over 67,000 predictions in six prediction categories”

Location in source introductory section on CASP14 participation

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-10-30

Source details and check notes

Authors: Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Maya Topf; Krzysztof Fidelis; John Moult
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-30 (SHA-256 df99b254a35a7840ddee25447610b25ab4a93154355ed2a0ec6db9b25d10710d). NIH author manuscript (PMC8726744) of Proteins 89(12):1607–1617; the publisher version of record was not retrieved.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-30
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Andriy Kryshtafovych, Torsten Schwede, Maya Topf, Krzysztof Fidelis, John Moult, “Critical Assessment of Methods of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP) – Round XIV”, 2021-10-07.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, AI in biology (research/ai-in-biology). The quotation (13 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-30. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

primary sourceSupports the claim

Critical Assessment of Methods of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP) – Round XIV

Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics (author manuscript in PubMed Central) · 2021-10-07

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“Structures of 52 proteins and protein-protein complexes were received from the experimental community in time for the assessments.”

Location in source same section

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-10-30

Source details and check notes

Authors: Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Maya Topf; Krzysztof Fidelis; John Moult
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-30 (SHA-256 df99b254a35a7840ddee25447610b25ab4a93154355ed2a0ec6db9b25d10710d). NIH author manuscript (PMC8726744) of Proteins 89(12):1607–1617; the publisher version of record was not retrieved.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-30
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Andriy Kryshtafovych, Torsten Schwede, Maya Topf, Krzysztof Fidelis, John Moult, “Critical Assessment of Methods of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP) – Round XIV”, 2021-10-07.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, AI in biology (research/ai-in-biology). The quotation (18 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-30. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor. An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. Date given in PMC's "Published in final edited form" line for the organisers' overview paper (kind not stated).

Record ID aib-mod-casp14-participation