Claim · 2021-07-15 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

Baek et al. (Science, 15 July 2021) state that the performance of their three-track model on the CASP14 targets was still not as good as AlphaFold2.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network → states provision → Stated limit: the three-track model performed less well than AlphaFold2 on CASP14 targets

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural networkstates provision ↓Stated limit: the three-track model performed less well than AlphaFold2 on CASP14 targets

Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editorStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Statement · provision ID mod-rosettafold-casp14-comparison
Date: 2021-07-15 · publication Records dated 2021 →

Scope and limitsThe authors' own comparison, made after CASP14 and outside the blind assessment.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network

Science (author manuscript in PubMed Central) · 2021-07-15

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“The performance of the 3-track model on the CASP14 targets was still not as good as AlphaFold2 (Fig. 1B).”

Location in source main text, comparison of the three-track model with AlphaFold2

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-10-30

Source details and check notes

Authors: Minkyung Baek; Frank DiMaio; Ivan Anishchenko; Justas Dauparas; Sergey Ovchinnikov; Gyu Rie Lee; Jue Wang; Qian Cong; Lisa N. Kinch; R. Dustin Schaeffer; Claudia Millán; Hahnbeom Park; Carson Adams; Caleb R. Glassman; Andy DeGiovanni; Jose H. Pereira; Andria V. Rodrigues; Alberdina A. van Dijk; Ana C. Ebrecht; Diederik J. Opperman; Theo Sagmeister; Christoph Buhlheller; Tea Pavkov-Keller; Manoj K. Rathinaswamy; Udit Dalwadi; Calvin K. Yip; John E. Burke; K. Christopher Garcia; Nick V. Grishin; Paul D. Adams; Randy J. Read; David Baker
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-30 (SHA-256 97b658d6feb3a092eca051a36d2e491d0072baf1166040664e7521d412323c7d). Europe PMC author manuscript (PMC7612213) of Science 373(6557):871–876; the title is printed there as "3-track"; science.org refuses direct retrieval.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-30
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Minkyung Baek, Frank DiMaio, Ivan Anishchenko, Justas Dauparas, Sergey Ovchinnikov, Gyu Rie Lee, Jue Wang, Qian Cong, Lisa N. Kinch, R. Dustin Schaeffer, Claudia Millán, Hahnbeom Park, Carson Adams, Caleb R. Glassman, Andy DeGiovanni, Jose H. Pereira, Andria V. Rodrigues, Alberdina A. van Dijk, Ana C. Ebrecht, Diederik J. Opperman, Theo Sagmeister, Christoph Buhlheller, Tea Pavkov-Keller, Manoj K. Rathinaswamy, Udit Dalwadi, Calvin K. Yip, John E. Burke, K. Christopher Garcia, Nick V. Grishin, Paul D. Adams, Randy J. Read, David Baker, “Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network”, 2021-07-15.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, AI in biology (research/ai-in-biology). The quotation (19 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-30. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor. An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. Date of the paper stating the comparison.

Record ID aib-mod-rosettafold-casp14-comparison