Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network
Science 373(6557), 871–876, published 15 July 2021 (author manuscript consulted). Publication date from the PMC author-manuscript header ("Science. 2021 Jul 15;373(6557):871–876"). Submission and acceptance dates are not stated there. The manuscript prints the title with "3-track"; the published title uses "three-track".
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- Minkyung Baek · David Baker
- Dates
- Published 2021-07-15 authorship evidence authorship evidence
- Exact source
- Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network Science (author manuscript in PubMed Central) · published 2021-07-15 · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-30 (SHA-256 97b658d6feb3a092eca051a36d2e491d0072baf1166040664e7521d412323c7d). Europe PMC author manuscript (PMC7612213) of Science 373(6557):871–876; the title is printed there as "3-track"; science.org refuses direct retrieval.
Appears in
No collection holds a record about this document yet.
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Issue and authorship records
- Author: Minkyung BaekMinkyung Baek is credited as the lead-listed author of ‘Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network’ (Science, 2021), as shown in the PubMed Central author manuscript.2021-07-15 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Minkyung Baek: person page →
- Author: David BakerDavid Baker is credited as a co-author of Baek et al., ‘Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network’ (Science, 2021), as shown in the PubMed Central author manuscript.2021-07-15 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗David Baker: person page →
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.
What the document states
A limited selection of what this document states, each with its passage. It describes the text, not whether anyone acted on it.
- StatementMethod stated to be made available to the scientific community“We make the method available to the scientific community to speed biological research.”abstractInspect claim & evidence ↗
- StatementStated limit: the three-track model performed less well than AlphaFold2 on CASP14 targets“The performance of the 3-track model on the CASP14 targets was still not as good as AlphaFold2 (Fig. 1B).”main text, comparison of the three-track model with AlphaFold2Inspect claim & evidence ↗
- StatementA three-track network as the stated contribution“We succeeded in producing a "two-track" network with information flowing in parallel along a 1D sequence alignment track and a 2D distance matrix track”main text, after the introductionInspect claim & evidence ↗
- StatementThe authors' statement about DeepMind's CASP14 predictions“DeepMind presented remarkably accurate predictions at the recent CASP14 protein structure prediction assessment conference.”abstractInspect claim & evidence ↗