Claim and evidence Close ×
The EIOPA Opinion on AI governance and risk management of 6 August 2025 states that AI systems in insurance that are neither prohibited nor high-risk under the AI Act continue to operate under existing sectoral legislation without new requirements, and that the Opinion sets out no new requirements but guidance on interpreting existing insurance legislation for AI systems. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2025-08-06 · publication Records dated 2025 → Role Articulation Register (kind of text) Nonfiction Scope and limits The scope excludes prohibited and high-risk AI systems, which fall under the EU AI Act, an AI-specific law; the record concerns insurance sectoral legislation only.
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
Opinion on AI governance and risk management (EIOPA-BoS-25-360) ↗ European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority · 2025-08-06
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “continue to operate subject to existing sectoral legislation without new requirements” Location in source Section 2, paragraph 2.5, PDF p. 3
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-06
Source details and check notes Authors European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 8cc95c0f5d318d44b9a444d8adf79e8758102be3c74adf91f3a8d1f1c6392737). Retrieved again at admission on 2026-11-06 (same file). PDF dated 6 August 2025 as served by eiopa.europa.eu on 2026-11-02 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-11-06 Language English (en) Attribution European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, “Opinion on AI governance and risk management (EIOPA-BoS-25-360)”, 2025-08-06. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, AI and money (research/ai-money). The quotation (11 words) matched a fresh retrieval of 2026-11-06 (the same file the candidate pack read). Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms. No human editorial review. primary source Supports the claim
Opinion on AI governance and risk management (EIOPA-BoS-25-360) ↗ European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority · 2025-08-06
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “This Opinion does not set out new requirements … This Opinion provides guidance on how to interpret various provisions of the existing insurance sectoral legislation in the context of AI systems” Location in source Section 2, paragraphs 2.8–2.9, PDF p. 4
How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher
Machine-checked · 2026-11-06
Source details and check notes Authors European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority Version Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 8cc95c0f5d318d44b9a444d8adf79e8758102be3c74adf91f3a8d1f1c6392737). Retrieved again at admission on 2026-11-06 (same file). PDF dated 6 August 2025 as served by eiopa.europa.eu on 2026-11-02 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-11-06 Language English (en) Attribution European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, “Opinion on AI governance and risk management (EIOPA-BoS-25-360)”, 2025-08-06. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage, AI and money (research/ai-money). The quotation (31 words) matched a fresh retrieval of 2026-11-06 (the same file the candidate pack read). Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms. No human editorial review. Status and meaning Editorial status. Machine-checked . Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document meets the proposition’s criterion. The record documents what the text states, in its register (fiction and satire are labelled); it is not evidence that the proposition is true and implies no influence on or from another text.
Date. Date of publication, as the text gives it.
Record ID am-u12-eiopa-2025-ai-opinion