Claim · 2026-09-14 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

The preface of the AI Safety Governance Framework 3.0 states that TC260 drafted it on the basis of the Framework 1.0 (2024) and 2.0 (2025), updating the risk classification and adjusting the technical and governance measures.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

AI Safety Governance Framework 3.0 (人工智能安全治理框架3.0) → supersedes version → AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0 (人工智能安全治理框架2.0)

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

AI Safety Governance Framework 3.0 (人工智能安全治理框架3.0)supersedes version ↓AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0 (人工智能安全治理框架2.0)

Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editorStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Subject version: 3.0 · Published 2026-09-14 · Effective date not established
Object version: 2.0 · Published 2025-09-15 · Effective date not established
Date: 2026-09-14 · publication Records dated 2026 →

Scope and limitsThe text names both earlier editions as its basis and describes updating the risk classification and adjusting the measures; it does not state that 2.0 or 1.0 is withdrawn, and no withdrawal of an earlier edition is recorded. Recorded against 2.0, the immediate predecessor; the same passage also names 1.0. Recorded as a succession of editions under the maintainer's decision of 2026-10-30; the relation is one of updating, not of replacement in law.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

人工智能安全治理框架3.0

全国网络安全标准化技术委员会 · 2026-09 · In Simplified Chinese (zh-Hans)

Archived copy, captured 2026-09-20: 人工智能安全治理框架3.0

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“在《人工智能安全治理框架 1.0》（2024年）、《人工智能安全治理框架2.0》（2025年）基础上，研究编制《人工智能安全治理框架3.0》”

Location in source Preface

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-10-31

Source details and check notes

Authors: 全国网络安全标准化技术委员会
Version: Dated document, retrieved on 2026-10-27 (SHA-256 cff709d8b1b2a0dfd2ff24df4d6b942b160975331e44c918e14a47d5c86da43d) directly from the publisher. Version: 《人工智能安全治理框架3.0》.pdf.pdf. Bilingual PDF attached to TC260's news item of 14 September 2026 (Chinese text followed by the publisher's English text). Quotes are from the Chinese text. English title (machine translation): “AI Safety Governance Framework 3.0”. Publisher as printed on the inspected expression: 全国网络安全标准化技术委员会 (tc260.org.cn).
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-27
Language: Simplified Chinese (zh-Hans)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2026-09-20: 人工智能安全治理框架3.0. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-09-20. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-27.
Attribution: 全国网络安全标准化技术委员会, “人工智能安全治理框架3.0”, 2026-09.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, Chinese frontier-AI institutions, third collection (research/china-labs-3). The quotation (43 words, each CJK character counted as one) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 and again in a fresh retrieval the same day, read directly from the publisher. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. Line-break spaces between Chinese characters and compatibility forms (⻛ for 风) in the PDF’s text layer were normalised at admission. English machine translation, not verified by a person: “on the basis of the AI Safety Governance Framework 1.0 (2024) and the AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0 (2025), researched and compiled the AI Safety Governance Framework 3.0”. A cross-family machine check (2026-10-31, item K116) answered the record’s question blind from fresh retrievals and agreed in part; the admission record lists how each point was handled. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor. An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. A publisher-documented replacement within one framework family. Direction is newer version to predecessor; later publication alone is insufficient. This does not revise or retire dataset claims.

Date. Release date of the citing edition, as the dataset records it.

Record ID c3-governance-tc260-asgf-v3-updates-v2