Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
Jones, “The A.I. Dilemma: Growth versus Existential Risk” (2023-11) bears on E05. Distinguishes the paper from Jones (2016) on growth versus lives lost; earlier the section lists Joy, Bostrom, Rees, Posner, Yudkowsky et al. and Ord as having highlighted AI existential risk. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2023-11 · publication Role Context Register (kind of text) Nonfiction Missing element States the paper's own focus relative to the author's earlier work; it does not say that economics neglected the topic. Tier Tier 1. NBER working paper (core venue); Jones is an economist. Scope and limits NBER w31837, November 2023; later published in AER: Insights (December 2024). E05 boundary, option A (maintainer decision of 2026-10-15): bears on E05, because its novelty claim is relative to the author's earlier paper (Jones 2016), not to the field.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
The A.I. Dilemma: Growth versus Existential Risk ↗ NBER Working Paper 31837 · 2023-11
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “This paper differs by focusing explicitly on the amazing potential benefits as well as the existential risk associated with artificial intelligence.” Location in source pdf p.5; §1, Related literature
Machine-checked · 2026-10-16
Source details and check notes Authors Charles I. Jones Version Current copy (NBER PDF), no archive capture compared. Retrieved 2026-10-11. SHA-256 0ac5f541a3c7152b60866b248f66cf2733bf12f01b204161abf375463669035e. Version a reader would cite, or full text, not retrieved. Jones, C. I. (2024). The AI dilemma: Growth versus existential risk. American Economic Review: Insights, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20230570 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-11 Language English (en) Attribution Charles I. Jones, “The A.I. Dilemma: Growth versus Existential Risk”, NBER Working Paper 31837, 2023-11. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage E05-17 (research/economics-mainstream/esoteric). The quotation (21 words) matched the retrieved current copy (SHA-256 0ac5f541a3c7152b60866b248f66cf2733bf12f01b204161abf375463669035e) in the pack's verification of 2026-10-15. Re-checked at admission on 2026-10-16 against a copy retrieved that day. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document bears on the proposition without meeting its criterion; the record names the missing element. It is not an articulation and implies no influence.
Date. Cover "November 2023". Journal version: AER: Insights, December 2024 (abstract page aeri2024-jones). Checked in a current copy; an archive capture was not available, so earlier bytes are not authenticated.
Record ID ec-e05-jones-2023-ai-dilemma-b