Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
Intelligence Explosion Microeconomics explicitly cites and discusses Good’s 1965 paper. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2013 · event Scope and limits This is a document-level citation and engagement claim, not an aggregate transmission claim about institutions.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Intelligence Explosion Microeconomics ↗ Machine Intelligence Research Institute · 2013
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase The report identifies Good’s 1965 paper by title and quotes its machine-design argument.
Location in source Printed page 1 (PDF page 4), section 1, opening paragraph
Machine-checked · 2026-09-17
Source details and check notes Authors Eliezer Yudkowsky Version Technical report 2013-1; last modified September 13, 2013 Version date 2013-09-13 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-17 Language English (en) Attribution Machine Intelligence Research Institute, Intelligence Explosion Microeconomics (2013). Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and minimal attributed excerpts only. Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Source passage inspected by an automated research assistant. Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. An explicit reference to a work. Citation alone is neither agreement nor causal influence.
Date. The date identifies this documented announcement or publication; it does not establish a continuing state.
Record ID iem-cites-good-2013