Versions No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Issue and authorship records Issued by: Machine Intelligence Research Institute MIRI published Intelligence Explosion Microeconomics as technical report 2013-1. 2013 · event · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗ MIRI: institution → Author: Eliezer Yudkowsky Intelligence Explosion Microeconomics credits Eliezer Yudkowsky as author. 2013 · event · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗ Eliezer Yudkowsky: person page → Documentary relations Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Cites · 2 Explicit references in this document. Citation is neither agreement nor influence.
Speculations Concerning the First Ultraintelligent Machine Intelligence Explosion Microeconomics explicitly cites and discusses Good’s 1965 paper. 2013 · event · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗ Speculations · 1965: document page → The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis Intelligence Explosion Microeconomics cites Chalmers’s 2010 philosophical analysis. 2013 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗ The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis: document page → Explicitly credits · 1 People or institutions this document expressly credits, with the scope stated in each record.
I. J. Good Intelligence Explosion Microeconomics attributes its opening quoted intelligence-explosion argument to Good. 2013 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗ I. J. Good: person page → Discusses · 1 Concepts explicitly discussed. No earliest use, invention or transmission is claimed.
Intelligence explosion Intelligence Explosion Microeconomics examines Good’s intelligence-explosion thesis through cognitive reinvestment. 2013 · event · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗ Intelligence explosion: propositions page → Articulates · 3 Propositions whose criterion a passage of this document meets. The record says what the text states, in its register; it is not evidence that the proposition is true.
Intelligence explosion Intelligence Explosion Microeconomics identifies the key issue as returns on cognitive reinvestment: the ability to turn more computing power, faster computers or better algorithms into cognitive labour that produces larger or faster brains or better mind designs. 2013-09-13 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗ Intelligence explosion: propositions page → Recursive self-improvement Intelligence Explosion Microeconomics analyses the returns on reinvesting cognitive gains in better mind designs. 2013-09-13 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗ Recursive self-improvement: propositions page → Fast or hard takeoff Intelligence Explosion Microeconomics argues that an AI that can reinvest the fruits of its intelligence in larger brains, faster processing and better algorithms should have growth curves sharply above human ones, the regime colloquially called hard takeoff. 2013-09-13 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗ Fast or hard takeoff: propositions page → Contests · 2 Propositions a passage of this document disputes, or a premise they depend on.
Diminishing returns rule out a runaway “Intelligence Explosion Microeconomics” (2013-09-13) contests Y10. Cites the hominid record as evidence against diminishing returns on cognitive improvement, and goes on to infer that researchers improving their own intelligence 'ought to go FOOM'. 2013-09-13 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗ Diminishing returns rule out a runaway: propositions page → Without hatred it will not harm us “Intelligence Explosion Microeconomics” (2013-09-13) contests Y19. Summarising the instrumental convergence thesis, he states that harm to humans can follow from generic resource-seeking strategies without any goal of harming them. 2013-09-13 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗ Without hatred it will not harm us: propositions page → Not recorded for this document: cited by · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.