Claim · 2023-11 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

The A.I. Dilemma: Growth versus Existential Risk cites Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

The A.I. Dilemma: Growth versus Existential Risk → cites → Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

The A.I. Dilemma: Growth versus Existential Riskcites ↓Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies

Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editorStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Date: 2023-11 · publication Records dated 2023 →

Scope and limitsAn explicit reference only; neither agreement nor influence. The citing text does not identify which version of the work was read.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

The A.I. Dilemma: Growth versus Existential Risk

NBER Working Paper 31837 · 2023-11

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Paraphrase

The text names the work by its title.

Location in source PDF p. 22, reference or mention by title

Machine-checked · 2026-10-31

Source details and check notes

Authors: Charles I. Jones
Version: Current copy (NBER PDF), no archive capture compared. Retrieved 2026-10-11. SHA-256 0ac5f541a3c7152b60866b248f66cf2733bf12f01b204161abf375463669035e. Version a reader would cite, or full text, not retrieved. Jones, C. I. (2024). The AI dilemma: Growth versus existential risk. American Economic Review: Insights, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20230570
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-11
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Charles I. Jones, “The A.I. Dilemma: Growth versus Existential Risk”, NBER Working Paper 31837, 2023-11.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, key papers (research/key-papers). The citation was matched (title with author and year) in the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 and re-found by its mechanical check. The paraphrase is Selekoa’s. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor. An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An explicit reference to a work. Citation alone is neither agreement nor causal influence.

Date. Date of the citing source as recorded in the dataset; unknown where the dataset has none.

Record ID kp-cites-jones-2023-ai-dilemma-superintelligence-paths-dangers-strategies-2014