Claim · 2025-07-10 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

EU GPAI Code of Practice states what the law question “Who is covered” asks.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

General-Purpose AI Code of Practice (final version, 10 July 2025) → states provision → Who is covered

Where it appears

Laws compared →

Claim and evidence

General-Purpose AI Code of Practice (final version, 10 July 2025)states provision ↓Who is covered

Machine-checkedStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Statement · provision ID comparison-law-q01
Subject version: Final version (10 July 2025) · Published 2025-07-10 · Effective date not established
Date: 2025-07-10 · publication Records dated 2025 →

Scope and limitsThe commitments are written as commitments of 'Signatories'; the Chapter is stated to be relevant only to providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk. The commitments are addressed to providers that sign the Code and choose to rely on it; the Code is not binding in itself (see the row’s standing). Terms defined in Article 3 of the AI Act apply (Glossary, opening paragraph). What the instrument’s text states, from the expression read. A cell records what the text requires of the parties it defines: not whether any developer falls within them, or complied.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

General-Purpose AI Code of Practice: Safety and Security chapter (final version, 10 July 2025)

European Commission · 2025-07-10

Archived copy, captured 2025-07-10: General-Purpose AI Code of Practice: Safety and Security chapter (final version, 10 July 2025)

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“this Safety and Security Chapter (“Chapter”) is only relevant for providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk and not AI systems”

Location in source Recitals, (b) (PDF p. 3)

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-04

Source details and check notes

Authors: Chairs and vice-chairs of the Code’s working groups (independent experts)
Version: PDF served by the Commission on 2026-10-04 (a re-rendered file of 43 pages); it has the same 15,392 words as the Internet Archive capture of 2025-07-10 (10:58 UTC, 40 pages), with a different reading order on the cover page. Every quote matched in both expressions. Publisher as printed on the inspected expression: European Commission (AI Office). Retrieved again for the laws-compared candidate pack on 2026-11-01 from the Publications Office’s repository (Cellar), because EUR-Lex returned an empty response (SHA-256 d879f9b54c6068aae57ebaead9d90ddaa46f2503312b9185367a724fa8da2f4a); the pack’s quotations were matched in it, and again in fresh retrievals of 2026-11-02 and 2026-11-04.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-04
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2025-07-10: General-Purpose AI Code of Practice: Safety and Security chapter (final version, 10 July 2025). Captured on the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-07-10. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-04.
Attribution: General-Purpose AI Code of Practice, Safety and Security chapter (10 July 2025), published by the European Commission.
Reuse: European Union; quoted briefly under the editorial policy. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, laws compared (research/laws-compared), cell eu-code-ss:Q01. The quotation (22 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-01 (SHA-256 d879f9b54c6068aae57ebaead9d90ddaa46f2503312b9185367a724fa8da2f4a) and again in fresh retrievals on 2026-11-02 and 2026-11-04. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. The same words are quoted in an earlier record of the dataset, so they add nothing to the source’s quotation count. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-02, item 90) checked this cell directly; its corrections were applied at the adjudication of 2026-11-02. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. Dated as the text compared is dated: the date of issue of its version, “Final version (10 July 2025)”.

Record ID lc-cell-eu-code-ss-q01