Claim · 2025-07-10 · publication · Inferred · Supported

No passage meeting the law question “In force” was found in EU GPAI Code of Practice within the inspected scope.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

General-Purpose AI Code of Practice (final version, 10 July 2025) → has no matching provision within the inspected scope → In force

Where it appears

Laws compared →

Claim and evidence

General-Purpose AI Code of Practice (final version, 10 July 2025)has no matching provision within the inspected scope ↓In force

Machine-checkedInferredSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Reasoning and premisesPremises: the law question asks for the following. The instrument’s own provision on entry into force, taking effect or operative date, quoted. A date computed from a rule (“the twentieth day following publication”) is quoted as the rule; any computed date is marked as computed. The inspected scope of EU GPAI Code of Practice was: Whole text. Terms searched: “entry into force|enter into force|in force”, “apply from|applies from|application”. Passages read and not counted: Appendix 1.3.1 (PDF p. 35), Appendix 1.3.3 (PDF p. 36), Appendix 3.4 (PDF p. 39): 'application' used of software interfaces, model applications and evaluator applications; not about effect of the Code. The conclusion is bounded by that scope and method.

Provision: Stated date · provision ID comparison-law-q11
Subject version: Final version (10 July 2025) · Published 2025-07-10 · Effective date not established
Date: 2025-07-10 · publication Records dated 2025 →

Scope and limitsThe Chapter contains no provision on its own entry into force or taking effect. A recorded absence within the stated scope of the text read: not evidence that the instrument lacks such a provision elsewhere, or that no other law imposes one.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

General-Purpose AI Code of Practice: Safety and Security chapter (final version, 10 July 2025)

European Commission · 2025-07-10

Archived copy, captured 2025-07-10: General-Purpose AI Code of Practice: Safety and Security chapter (final version, 10 July 2025)

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Paraphrase

Within the inspected scope, no passage meeting the law question “In force” was found.

Location in source EU GPAI Code of Practice: Whole text

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-04

Source details and check notes

Authors: Chairs and vice-chairs of the Code’s working groups (independent experts)
Version: PDF served by the Commission on 2026-10-04 (a re-rendered file of 43 pages); it has the same 15,392 words as the Internet Archive capture of 2025-07-10 (10:58 UTC, 40 pages), with a different reading order on the cover page. Every quote matched in both expressions. Publisher as printed on the inspected expression: European Commission (AI Office). Retrieved again for the laws-compared candidate pack on 2026-11-01 from the Publications Office’s repository (Cellar), because EUR-Lex returned an empty response (SHA-256 d879f9b54c6068aae57ebaead9d90ddaa46f2503312b9185367a724fa8da2f4a); the pack’s quotations were matched in it, and again in fresh retrievals of 2026-11-02 and 2026-11-04.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-04
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2025-07-10: General-Purpose AI Code of Practice: Safety and Security chapter (final version, 10 July 2025). Captured on the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-07-10. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-10-04.
Attribution: General-Purpose AI Code of Practice, Safety and Security chapter (10 July 2025), published by the European Commission.
Reuse: European Union; quoted briefly under the editorial policy. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice.
Check notes: Absence recorded for the laws-compared candidate pack (research/laws-compared) on 2026-11-01 by an automated research assistant and audited in a fresh context by the same model family. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-02, item 12) answered this cell blind and agreed with the pack. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. A recorded absence: within the stated locator scope of an exact edition, no passage stating the keyed provision was found. It is not an inferred deletion and says nothing about other documents, practice or intent.

Date. Dated as the text compared is dated: the date of issue of its version, “Final version (10 July 2025)”.

Record ID lc-cell-eu-code-ss-q11