Claim · 2025-12-19 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

NY RAISE Act, Chapter 699 (2025) states what the law question “Penalties” asks.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

New York S6953-B (2025), the RAISE Act, signed as Chapter 699 of 2025 → states provision → Penalties

Where it appears

Laws compared →

Claim and evidence

New York S6953-B (2025), the RAISE Act, signed as Chapter 699 of 2025states provision ↓Penalties

Machine-checkedStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Statement · provision ID comparison-law-q13
Subject version: S6953-B as passed, signed as Chapter 699 (19 December 2025) · Published 2025-12-19 · Effective date not established
Date: 2025-12-19 · publication Records dated 2025 →

Scope and limitsFor violations of § 1421, determined based on severity of the violation, in a civil action by the attorney general; injunctive or declaratory relief is also available (§ 1422(1)(b)). No private right of action (§ 1422(2)). What the instrument’s text states, from the expression read. A cell records what the text requires of the parties it defines: not whether any developer falls within them, or complied.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

New York Senate Bill S6953-B (2025–2026): AN ACT to amend the general business law, in relation to the training and use of artificial intelligence frontier models

New York State Legislature · Publication date unknown

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“a civil penalty in an amount not exceeding ten million dollars for a first violation and in an amount not exceeding thirty million dollars for any subsequent violation”

Location in source Proposed GBL § 1422(1)(a), p. 5, lines 4–7

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-04

Source details and check notes

Authors: New York State Senate
Version: Retrieved on 2026-10-27 (SHA-256 6e195f0cb9696075e6e5d5ae1cac9533efd6c370fa8157be4e193875112a5282). Print number 6953-B as amended on 9 June 2025 (the print that passed both houses on 12 June 2025 and was signed as Chapter 699 of 2025, per the Assembly bill record). The chapter as printed in the session laws was not inspected. The text layer renders 10^26 as "10º26". Publisher as printed on the inspected expression: New York State Senate, Open Legislation (legislation.nysenate.gov). Retrieved again for the laws-compared candidate pack on 2026-11-01 (SHA-256 b0f5563f7ba4d868a04b3ed49554f686a078c8ca5dcadea47c7aee25c90b631e), bytes that differ from the retrieval above; the pack’s quotations were matched in it, and again in retrievals of 2026-11-02 and 2026-11-04, which served different bytes once more.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-27
Language: English (en)
Attribution: New York State Senate, “New York Senate Bill S6953-B (2025–2026): AN ACT to amend the general business law, in relation to the training and use of artificial intelligence frontier models”.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, laws compared (research/laws-compared), cell ny-ch699:Q13. The quotation (28 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-01 (SHA-256 b0f5563f7ba4d868a04b3ed49554f686a078c8ca5dcadea47c7aee25c90b631e) and again in fresh retrievals on 2026-11-02 and 2026-11-04. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. The same words are quoted in an earlier record of the dataset, so they add nothing to the source’s quotation count. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-02, item 31) answered this cell blind and agreed with the pack. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. Dated as the text compared is dated: the date of issue of its version, “S6953-B as passed, signed as Chapter 699 (19 December 2025)”.

Record ID lc-cell-ny-ch699-q13