Claim · 2025-04-10 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Model Card states in part what the model-card question “Safeguards tied to determination” asks.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Model Card → states provision → Safeguards tied to determination

Where it appears

Model cards compared →

Claim and evidence

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Model Cardstates provision ↓Safeguards tied to determination

Machine-checkedStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Model-card question · provision ID model-card-q06
Subject version: As dated 'Model card published April 10, 2025' in its header · Published 2025-04-10 · Effective date not established
Date: 2025-04-10 · publication Records dated 2025 →

Scope and limitsThe card lists mitigations (dataset filtering, conditional pre-training, fine-tuning, reinforcement learning from feedback, safety policies, product-level filtering) without tying any of them to a framework determination. This is the developer's account of the mitigations. Search for the rest of the criterion: 'Ethics and Safety'. Terms searched: “mitigation”, “safeguard”, “Frontier Safety”, “security”. Stated, partly: the passage has what the question’s criterion asks for, in a weaker or narrower form than the criterion’s own words. What the card states, quoted from the expression read. A card is the developer’s own account: not evidence that an evaluation was run as described, that a safeguard works, or that a finding is independent.

The evidence 02

primary sourceSupports the claim

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Model Card

Google DeepMind · 2025-04-10

Archived copy, captured 2026-03-21: Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Model Card

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“Mitigations include, but are not limited to:”

Location in source 'Ethics and Safety', 'Risks and Mitigations', PDF p. 7

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-04

Source details and check notes

Authors: Google DeepMind
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-04 (SHA-256 fafcad388912b4108943b9332399c34e55001e102cb67432a78e32d05db62757) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. The archive capture was found by an index search of the Internet Archive on 2026-11-03; it was not opened, and its bytes are not authenticated.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-04
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2026-03-21: Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Model Card. Captured 345 days after the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-03-21. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-11-04.
Attribution: Google DeepMind, “Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Model Card”, 2025-04-10.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards-2). The quotation (7 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-04 (SHA-256 fafcad388912b4108943b9332399c34e55001e102cb67432a78e32d05db62757) and again on 2026-11-04, after the adjudication, in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-04, item 50) checked this passage’s cell and agreed with the pack. No human editorial review.

primary sourceSupports the claim

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Model Card

Google DeepMind · 2025-04-10

Archived copy, captured 2026-03-21: Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Model Card

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“product-level mitigations such as safety filtering.”

Location in source 'Ethics and Safety', 'Risks and Mitigations', PDF p. 7

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-04

Source details and check notes

Authors: Google DeepMind
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-04 (SHA-256 fafcad388912b4108943b9332399c34e55001e102cb67432a78e32d05db62757) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. The archive capture was found by an index search of the Internet Archive on 2026-11-03; it was not opened, and its bytes are not authenticated.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-04
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2026-03-21: Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Model Card. Captured 345 days after the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-03-21. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-11-04.
Attribution: Google DeepMind, “Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Model Card”, 2025-04-10.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards-2). The quotation (6 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-04 (SHA-256 fafcad388912b4108943b9332399c34e55001e102cb67432a78e32d05db62757) and again on 2026-11-04, after the adjudication, in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-04, item 50) checked this passage’s cell and agreed with the pack. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. Dated as the card read is dated: its printed date, as the source records it.

Record ID mc-cell-google-deepmind-gemini-2-0-flash-lite-q06