Claim · 2025-04-15 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

Gemini 2.0 Flash Model Card states what the model-card question “Framework cited” asks.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Gemini 2.0 Flash Model Card → states provision → Framework cited

Where it appears

Model cards compared →

Claim and evidence

Gemini 2.0 Flash Model Cardstates provision ↓Framework cited

Machine-checkedStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Model-card question · provision ID model-card-q03
Subject version: As dated 'Model card published April 15, 2025' in its header · Published 2025-04-15 · Effective date not established
Date: 2025-04-15 · publication Records dated 2025 →

Scope and limitsThe card names the Frontier Safety Framework; the text gives no version, but the hyperlink on these words points to a framework PDF whose cover reads "Version 2.0" and "4th February 2025" (Frontier Safety Framework v2.0). The file linked differs in bytes from the dataset's other file of that edition; both covers give the same version and date. What the card states, quoted from the expression read. A card is the developer’s own account: not evidence that an evaluation was run as described, that a safeguard works, or that a finding is independent.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

Gemini 2.0 Flash Model Card

Google DeepMind · 2025-04-15

Archived copy, captured 2026-03-20: Gemini 2.0 Flash Model Card

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“Frontier Safety Framework evaluations according to Google DeepMind’s Frontier Safety Framework (FSF)”

Location in source 'Ethics and Safety', 'Evaluation Approach', PDF p. 5 (hyperlinked words)

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-04

Source details and check notes

Authors: Google DeepMind
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-04 (SHA-256 b1575ae4e9dcbc6aef722adab208b9798d26dc39eb2fb63fc7d04bd47b9bd597) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. The archive capture was found by an index search of the Internet Archive on 2026-11-03; it was not opened, and its bytes are not authenticated.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-04
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2026-03-20: Gemini 2.0 Flash Model Card. Captured 339 days after the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-03-20. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-11-04.
Attribution: Google DeepMind, “Gemini 2.0 Flash Model Card”, 2025-04-15.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards-2). The quotation (12 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-04 (SHA-256 b1575ae4e9dcbc6aef722adab208b9798d26dc39eb2fb63fc7d04bd47b9bd597) and again on 2026-11-04, after the adjudication, in a fresh retrieval with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. Edition identified by link annotation: the hyperlink on these words points to https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/DeepMind.com/Blog/updating-the-frontier-safety-framework/Frontier%20Safety%20Framework%202.0%20(1).pdf, whose cover reads 'Version 2.0' and '4th February 2025'. The quotation check cannot verify a link; the drafting pass read its target on 2026-11-04, and the cross-family check of 2026-11-04 read and confirmed it (maintainer decision 4a of 2026-11-03). A cross-family machine check (2026-11-04, item 12) checked this passage’s cell and agreed with the pack. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. Dated as the card read is dated: its printed date, as the source records it.

Record ID mc-cell-google-deepmind-gemini-2-0-flash-q03