Claim · 2025-10-08 · revision · Stated in source · Supported

Code World Model Preparedness Report states what the model-card question “Alignment and deception” asks.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Code World Model Preparedness Report → states provision → Alignment and deception

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

Code World Model Preparedness Reportstates provision ↓Alignment and deception

Machine-checkedStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Model-card question · provision ID model-card-q11
Subject version: The expression dated October 8, 2025 · Publication date unknown · Effective date not established · Revised 2025-10-08
Date: 2025-10-08 · revision Records dated 2025 →

Scope and limitsThe report states an honesty (epistemic integrity) evaluation with a conclusion, and states that corrigibility and power-seeking propensities were assessed but their results are not included. What the card states, quoted from the expression read. A card is the developer’s own account: not evidence that an evaluation was run as described, that a safeguard works, or that a finding is independent.

The evidence 02

primary sourceSupports the claim

Code World Model Preparedness Report

Meta · Publication date unknown

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“our preliminary evaluations suggest that CWM shows undesirable propensities at rates comparable to most open-source models”

Location in source Section 1 Introduction, PDF p. 1

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-02

Source details and check notes

Authors: Meta
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 9fb37fa4970f40a0e6ffa4bb260bc72f370b9e5801401dcf281eaabe321bcd7c) directly from the publisher’s host. On 2026-11-03 the recorded address answered HTTP 403 to the pack's second retrieval; the cross-family check of 2026-11-03 retrieved the original file again from Meta's publication page, with the same SHA-256. PDF linked from Meta's publication page (dated September 24, 2025); the report prints 'Date: October 8, 2025'. The CDN address requires signed query parameters, removed here; the publication page returned HTTP 400 to direct retrieval and was read through a fetch tool.
Version date: 2025-10-08
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Meta, “Code World Model Preparedness Report”.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (16 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 9fb37fa4970f40a0e6ffa4bb260bc72f370b9e5801401dcf281eaabe321bcd7c). On 2026-11-03 the report's recorded address answered HTTP 403, so the pack's second verification had no cached text for it; the quotation matched the retrieved text on 2026-11-02, and the cross-family check of 2026-11-03 retrieved the original file again from Meta's publication page with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

primary sourceSupports the claim

Code World Model Preparedness Report

Meta · Publication date unknown

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“Although our internal results did not reveal any concerning findings, we believe our research is still too nascent for meaningful interpretation.”

Location in source Section 4 Propensities, PDF p. 10

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-02

Source details and check notes

Authors: Meta
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 9fb37fa4970f40a0e6ffa4bb260bc72f370b9e5801401dcf281eaabe321bcd7c) directly from the publisher’s host. On 2026-11-03 the recorded address answered HTTP 403 to the pack's second retrieval; the cross-family check of 2026-11-03 retrieved the original file again from Meta's publication page, with the same SHA-256. PDF linked from Meta's publication page (dated September 24, 2025); the report prints 'Date: October 8, 2025'. The CDN address requires signed query parameters, removed here; the publication page returned HTTP 400 to direct retrieval and was read through a fetch tool.
Version date: 2025-10-08
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Attribution: Meta, “Code World Model Preparedness Report”.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, model cards compared (research/model-cards). The quotation (21 words) matched the card’s text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 9fb37fa4970f40a0e6ffa4bb260bc72f370b9e5801401dcf281eaabe321bcd7c). On 2026-11-03 the report's recorded address answered HTTP 403, so the pack's second verification had no cached text for it; the quotation matched the retrieved text on 2026-11-02, and the cross-family check of 2026-11-03 retrieved the original file again from Meta's publication page with the same SHA-256. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. Dated as the card read is dated: the date of its revision, as the source records it.

Record ID mc-cell-meta-cwm-preparedness-q11