Claim · 2025-12-18 · publication · Inferred · Supported

No passage meeting the model-card question “Persuasion” was found in Addendum to GPT-5.2 System Card: GPT-5.2-Codex within the inspected scope.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Addendum to GPT-5.2 System Card: GPT-5.2-Codex → has no matching provision within the inspected scope → Persuasion

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

Addendum to GPT-5.2 System Card: GPT-5.2-Codexhas no matching provision within the inspected scope ↓Persuasion

Machine-checkedInferredSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Reasoning and premisesPremises: the model-card question asks for the following. The card reports that evaluations of persuasive or manipulative capability were run and states their outcome category or conclusion. Partly if evaluations are reported without an outcome. Not found includes a card that states the domain was removed from evaluation; the note says so. The inspected scope of Addendum to GPT-5.2 System Card: GPT-5.2-Codex was: Whole card (22 pages). Terms searched: “persua”, “manipulat”, “influence”, “convinc”. Passages read and not counted: §5.1.2.3 Cyber Range, Table 7, PDF p. 16 (printed p. 15): “LDAP manipulation” names a cyber-range technique, not manipulation of people. The conclusion is bounded by that scope and method.

Provision: Model-card question · provision ID model-card-q10
Subject version: As dated December 18, 2025 on its cover · Published 2025-12-18 · Effective date not established
Date: 2025-12-18 · publication Records dated 2025 →

Scope and limitsNo passage reporting an evaluation of persuasive or manipulative capability was found. The card’s Preparedness section addresses the Biological and Chemical, Cybersecurity and AI Self-Improvement domains. A recorded absence within the stated scope of the card read: not evidence that the developer did not do the thing asked about, or did not disclose it elsewhere.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

Addendum to GPT-5.2 System Card: GPT-5.2-Codex

OpenAI · 2025-12-18

Archived copy, captured 2025-12-19: Addendum to GPT-5.2 System Card: GPT-5.2-Codex

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Paraphrase

Within the inspected scope, no passage meeting the model-card question “Persuasion” was found.

Location in source Addendum to GPT-5.2 System Card: GPT-5.2-Codex: Whole card (22 pages)

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-02

Source details and check notes

Authors: OpenAI
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 5fe918b740727770d0571684fd8c168190172649d2b2e8b7ca4cacad23b3e027) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. The archive capture was found by an index search of the Internet Archive on 2026-11-03; it was not opened, and its bytes are not authenticated.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2025-12-19: Addendum to GPT-5.2 System Card: GPT-5.2-Codex. Captured 1 day after the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-12-19. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-11-02.
Attribution: OpenAI, “Addendum to GPT-5.2 System Card: GPT-5.2-Codex”, 2025-12-18.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Absence recorded for the model-cards candidate pack (research/model-cards) on 2026-11-02 by an automated research assistant and audited in a fresh context by the same model family. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. A recorded absence: within the stated locator scope of an exact edition, no passage stating the keyed provision was found. It is not an inferred deletion and says nothing about other documents, practice or intent.

Date. Dated as the card read is dated: its printed date, as the source records it.

Record ID mc-cell-openai-gpt-5-2-codex-q10