Claim · 2025-11-17 · publication · Inferred · Supported

No passage meeting the model-card question “Red-teaming” was found in Grok 4.1 Model Card within the inspected scope.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

Grok 4.1 Model Card → has no matching provision within the inspected scope → Red-teaming

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

Grok 4.1 Model Cardhas no matching provision within the inspected scope ↓Red-teaming

Machine-checkedInferredSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Reasoning and premisesPremises: the model-card question asks for the following. A passage reporting adversarial testing described as red-teaming (internal, external or both), quoted with its scope (domains, number or kind of testers, or period) where given. Partly if red-teaming is mentioned without any scope. The inspected scope of Grok 4.1 Model Card was: Whole card. Terms searched: “red team”, “red-team”, “red teaming”, “adversarial”, “jailbreak”, “tester”. Passages read and not counted: §2.1.2 Evaluations, 'Adversarial robustness', p. 2: Adversarial testing on internal jailbreak templates and a prompt-injection suite; not described as red-teaming. §2.1.1 Safety Training Approach, p. 1: Adversarial attacks used to train input filters; training, not testing described as red-teaming. The conclusion is bounded by that scope and method.

Provision: Model-card question · provision ID model-card-q12
Subject version: As dated November 17, 2025 under its title · Published 2025-11-17 · Effective date not established
Date: 2025-11-17 · publication Records dated 2025 →

Scope and limitsNo testing described as red-teaming was found. The card reports adversarial robustness evaluations (jailbreak templates, prompt injection) without calling them red-teaming. A recorded absence within the stated scope of the card read: not evidence that the developer did not do the thing asked about, or did not disclose it elsewhere.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

Grok 4.1 Model Card

xAI · 2025-11-17

Archived copy, captured 2025-11-17: Grok 4.1 Model Card

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Paraphrase

Within the inspected scope, no passage meeting the model-card question “Red-teaming” was found.

Location in source Grok 4.1 Model Card: Whole card.

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-11-03

Source details and check notes

Authors: xAI
Version: Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-11-02 (SHA-256 635f30c2ea83cd2b4a1ef46bb7626e8330b635e826c53a6e77f07b279780ad6d) directly from the publisher’s host. Retrieved again on 2026-11-03 with the same SHA-256. The archive capture was found by an index search of the Internet Archive on 2026-11-03; it was not opened, and its bytes are not authenticated.
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-11-02
Language: English (en)
Archive copy: Open archived copy, captured 2025-11-17: Grok 4.1 Model Card. Captured on the recorded publication date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2025-11-17. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-11-02.
Attribution: xAI, “Grok 4.1 Model Card”, 2025-11-17.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Absence recorded for the model-cards candidate pack (research/model-cards) on 2026-11-02 by an automated research assistant and audited in a fresh context by the same model family. A cross-family machine check (2026-11-03, item 83) checked this cell and agreed with the pack. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Machine-checked. Machines found this record and checked it against its sources; no person accepted it individually. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. A recorded absence: within the stated locator scope of an exact edition, no passage stating the keyed provision was found. It is not an inferred deletion and says nothing about other documents, practice or intent.

Date. Dated as the card read is dated: its printed date, as the source records it.

Record ID mc-cell-xai-grok-4-1-q12