Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
RSP v3.0 states that, in the scenario where competitors have strong safety measures, Anthropic will, for its highly capable frontier models, meet or exceed the overall risk reduction posture of these competitors as far as it can tell from its best efforts to assess that posture, and that until it is able to do so it will delay AI development and deployment as needed to achieve this. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Provision Required action · provision ID rsp-competitor-parity Subject version v3.0 · Published 2026-02-24 · Effective 2026-02-24 Date 2026-02-24 · effective Scope and limits What the edition states, quoted from the cited expression. It is not evidence of implementation, compliance or effectiveness.
The evidence 02 primary source Supports the claim
Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.0 ↗ Anthropic · 2026-02-24
Archived copy, captured 2026-02-24: Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.0 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “For our highly capable frontier models, we will meet or exceed the overall risk reduction posture of these competitors, as far as we can tell based on our best efforts to assess that posture.” Location in source PDF p. 16 (printed p. 16), Appendix A: Commitments Related to Competitors, table row 'Competitors have strong safety measures', Commitment column, first sentence
Machine-checked · 2026-10-03
Source details and check notes Authors Anthropic Version Responsible Scaling Policy v3.0; effective date 2026-02-24. Version date 2026-02-24 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-18 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2026-02-24: Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.0 ↗ . Captured on the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-02-24. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.Attribution Anthropic, Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.0. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Verbatim excerpt checked by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-03 against the PDF served through the recorded URL’s redirect, byte-identical to the Internet Archive capture of 2026-02-24. Extraction note: Scenario column: strong evidence that all competitors who have developed or will soon develop a highly capable frontier model can make strong arguments that catastrophic risk is contained. The cell's second sentence, which commits to delay AI development and deployment as needed until Anthropic is able to meet that posture, is quoted as a separate passage (2026-10-25); the whole cell is 53 words. Same wording in v3.1–v3.4 (PDF p. 17); not recorded there (bounded). Human editorial review is pending. primary source Supports the claim
Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.0 ↗ Anthropic · 2026-02-24
Archived copy, captured 2026-02-24: Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.0 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “Until we are able to do so, we will delay AI development and deployment as needed to achieve this.” Location in source PDF p. 16 (printed p. 16), Appendix A: Commitments Related to Competitors, table row 'Competitors have strong safety measures', Commitment column, second sentence
Machine-checked · 2026-10-25
Source details and check notes Authors Anthropic Version Responsible Scaling Policy v3.0; effective date 2026-02-24. Version date 2026-02-24 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-18 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2026-02-24: Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.0 ↗ . Captured on the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-02-24. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.Attribution Anthropic, Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.0. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Verbatim excerpt checked on 2026-10-25 against the publisher’s pinned v3.0 PDF (www-cdn.anthropic.com/e670587677525f28df69b59e5fb4c22cc5461a17.pdf, SHA-256 a71bfa08a7fa4b750b2b408b4b9c8681ad50c6b53271c314f591c59c84c38064), which the cross-family check of 2026-10-25 found byte-identical to the Internet Archive capture of 2026-02-24. A stated commitment, not evidence of practice or compliance. Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. An exact framework edition states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), or a stated exception. The quoted text records what the edition says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.
Date. Provision as stated in this edition, dated by the edition’s effective date.
Record ID prov-rsp-v3-0-competitor-parity