Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
v3.4 counts the dramatic-acceleration scenario of the Automated R&D threshold as having occurred where the observed or expected doubling of AI progress is measured against both the rate Anthropic would expect and the fastest rate of extended progress it has observed (over at least three model generations) without significant AI contributions to AI R&D, and where continuing the trend “seems likely to lead to” even greater acceleration; v3.3 measured the doubling against the expected rate alone, and continuing the trend “could lead to” even greater acceleration. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 2 sources
Basis of the change Official changelog Provision Threshold or trigger · provision ID rsp-automated-rd-threshold Subject version v3.4 · Publication date unknown · Effective 2026-07-08 Object version v3.3 · Publication date unknown · Effective 2026-05-26 Date 2026-07-08 · effective Scope and limits A textual difference between the two editions’ wording of this keyed provision. It is not an assessment of whether the change strengthened or weakened the framework, and not evidence of implementation.
The evidence 03 primary source Supports the claim
Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.4 ↗ Anthropic · Publication date unknown
Archived copy, captured 2026-07-10: Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.4 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase v3.4 measures the doubling of the rate of progress in AI aggregate capabilities against both the rate Anthropic would expect and the fastest rate of extended progress (footnote 9: over at least three model generations) it has observed without significant AI contributions to AI R&D, and asks whether continuing the trend seems likely to lead to even greater acceleration.
Location in source PDF pp. 9–10 (printed pp. 9–10), §1 table row 'Automated R&D in key domains', left column, paragraph beginning 'We would consider scenario (2)', with footnote 9
Machine-checked · 2026-10-03
Source details and check notes Authors Anthropic Version Responsible Scaling Policy v3.4; effective date 2026-07-08. Version date 2026-07-08 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-18 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2026-07-10: Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.4 ↗ . Captured 2 days after the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-07-10. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.Attribution Anthropic, Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.4. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Paraphrase checked by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-03 against the cited edition; the edition’s own wording is quoted in its provision record. Human editorial review is pending. primary source Supports the claim
Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.3 ↗ Anthropic · Publication date unknown
Archived copy, captured 2026-05-28: Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.3 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase v3.3 measures the doubling of the rate of progress in AI aggregate capabilities against the rate Anthropic would expect without significant AI contributions to AI R&D, and asks whether continuing the trend could lead to even greater acceleration.
Location in source PDF pp. 9–10 (printed pp. 9–10), §1 table row 'Automated R&D in key domains', left column, paragraph beginning 'We would consider scenario (2)'
Machine-checked · 2026-10-03
Source details and check notes Authors Anthropic Version Responsible Scaling Policy v3.3; effective date 2026-05-26. Version date 2026-05-26 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-18 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2026-05-28: Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.3 ↗ . Captured 2 days after the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-05-28. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.Attribution Anthropic, Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.3. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Paraphrase checked by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-03 against the cited edition; the edition’s own wording is quoted in its provision record. Human editorial review is pending. primary source Supports the claim
Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.4 ↗ Anthropic · Publication date unknown
Archived copy, captured 2026-07-10: Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.4 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase The v3.4 change log says, as item 1, that the update revises the Automated R&D capability threshold in light of further discussion, particularly whether the threshold would count as crossed if the overall rate of AI progress were constant or slowing but estimated to be dramatically faster than without advanced AI tools; Anthropic says it would not, and that the threshold is intended to capture the onset of dramatic recursive self-improvement.
Location in source Changelog entry 'July 8, 2026 (RSP v3.4)', item 1, PDF p. 20 (printed p. 20)
Machine-checked · 2026-10-03
Source details and check notes Authors Anthropic Version Responsible Scaling Policy v3.4; effective date 2026-07-08. Version date 2026-07-08 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-18 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2026-07-10: Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.4 ↗ . Captured 2 days after the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-07-10. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.Attribution Anthropic, Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.4. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Paraphrase checked by an automated research assistant on 2026-10-03 against the cited edition; the edition’s own wording is quoted in its provision record. Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. One scoped difference between document versions. The claim identifies publisher-stated change, official changelog/redline, or an explicitly inferred comparison. It does not establish implementation, effectiveness or a safety ranking.
Date. Dated by the later edition’s effective date.
Record ID provchange-rsp-v3-4-automated-rd-threshold