Claim · 2023-03-15 · publication · Stated in source · Supported

The GPT-4 Technical Report (2023) states that, given the competitive landscape and safety implications, it contains no further details about the architecture, model size, hardware, training compute, dataset construction or training method.

One recorded claim. The claim panel gives its qualification, the source passages with their place in each source, and how it was checked.

What it connects

GPT-4 Technical Report → states provision → The GPT-4 Technical Report contains no further details about architecture, model size, hardware, training compute, dataset construction or training method.

Where it appears

No collection page holds this claim. It is listed with its records in the explorer.

Claim and evidence

GPT-4 Technical Reportstates provision ↓The GPT-4 Technical Report contains no further details about architecture, model size, hardware, training compute, dataset construction or training method.

Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editorStated in sourceSupported

Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source

Provision: Statement · provision ID tl-gpt4-withholds
Date: 2023-03-15 · publication Records dated 2023 →

Scope and limitsThe report's statement of its own scope; the stated reasons are the authors'.

The evidence 01

primary sourceSupports the claim

GPT-4 Technical Report

arXiv · 2023-03-15

Cite the original source

Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.

Source excerpt

“Given both the competitive landscape and the safety implications of large-scale models like GPT-4, this report contains no further details about the architecture (including model size), hardware, training compute, dataset construction, training method, or similar.”

Location in source PDF p. 2, section 2

How it was read Retrieved directly from the publisher

Machine-checked · 2026-10-31

Source details and check notes

Authors: OpenAI
Version: arXiv:2303.08774v1, submitted 15 March 2023 (UTC). Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 053056a10114d22e4c47b6b5be25e54c320b5f1beeae7466e8638dac0f5f5f66). The first page prints the collective byline “OpenAI”; contributors listed elsewhere in the text are not recorded as authors.
Version date: 2023-03-15
Canonical address: Open the canonical source ↗
Accessed: 2026-10-28
Language: English (en)
Attribution: OpenAI, “GPT-4 Technical Report”, 2023-03-15.
Reuse: No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution.
Check notes: Candidate pack passage, Kinds of AI and technical history (research/technical-history). The quotation (35 words) matched the text retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29. Matching ignored differences of whitespace, case, quotation marks, dashes, PDF line-break hyphens and Unicode compatibility forms, so the source’s typography can differ. No human editorial review.

Status and meaning

Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor. An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.

Relation. An exact framework edition, or another document with an exact expression, states one provision: a capability threshold or risk level and its trigger, a required safeguard or action, a decision authority (who decides, recommends, can overrule or is informed), a stated exception, or another statement of its content, such as a licence term or a prospectus statement. The passage records what the document says, not implementation, compliance or effectiveness. Provisions with the same key align across editions of one family.

Date. Dated by the text that states it, 15 March 2023. The statement reports 15 March 2023: Date of submission (an arXiv version or a journal’s received date, as the source states it); not a later revision or the venue’s publication date.

Record ID th-tl-gpt4-withholds