GPT-4 Technical Report
Work-level record. Its arXiv versions and any conference or journal version are listed as sources, each with its own date. The byline prints the collective name “OpenAI”. A citation to the work does not identify which version the citing author read.
- Issued by
- OpenAI
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source records list arXiv and OpenAI.
- Dates
- Dated event (basis not stated) 2023-03-15 issue evidence
- Exact source
- GPT-4 Technical Report arXiv · published 2023-03-15 · arXiv abstract page, retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 c4ef1617f43aa10197fd9c00f1ddfc26d19c026968ddbc81528e537b810f53a6). Submission history as arXiv records it (UTC): v1 15 March 2023; v2 16 March 2023; v3 27 March 2023; v4 19 December 2023; v5 1 March 2024; v6 4 March 2024. The page serves the latest version; each version is a separate expression, and only the one a record names was read.
- GPT-4 Technical Report arXiv · published 2023-03-15 · arXiv:2303.08774v1, submitted 15 March 2023 (UTC). Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 053056a10114d22e4c47b6b5be25e54c320b5f1beeae7466e8638dac0f5f5f66). The first page prints the collective byline “OpenAI”; contributors listed elsewhere in the text are not recorded as authors.
Appears in
No collection holds a record about this document yet.
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Issue and authorship records
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Cites · 1
Explicit references in this document. Citation is neither agreement nor influence.
Cited by · 7
Recorded documents that explicitly reference this one. A citation to a work does not identify which version was read.
- GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language ModelsGPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models cites GPT-4 Technical Report.2023-03-17 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Eloundou et al., GPTs are GPTs (2023): document page →
- Qwen Technical ReportQwen Technical Report cites GPT-4 Technical Report.2023-09-28 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Qwen Technical Report: document page →
- Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak SupervisionWeak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervision cites GPT-4 Technical Report.2023-12-14 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervision: document page →
- Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal ModelsGemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models cites GPT-4 Technical Report.2023-12-19 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models: document page →
- ChatGLM research history and techniquesChatGLM research history and techniques cites GPT-4 Technical Report.2024-06-18 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗ChatGLM research history and techniques: document page →
- Seed-Thinking-v1.5: Advancing Superb Reasoning Models with Reinforcement LearningSeed-Thinking-v1.5: Advancing Superb Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learning cites GPT-4 Technical Report.2025-04-10 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Seed-Thinking-v1.5: Advancing Superb Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learning: document page →
- GPT-4 System CardGPT-4 System Card cites GPT-4 Technical Report.Date unknown · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗GPT-4 System Card: document page →
Ideas attributed to this work by · 1
Recorded documents that attribute an argument, concept, term, finding or approach to this one. Each attribution is the citing document’s claim.
- GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language ModelsEloundou et al. (2023) cite the GPT-4 technical report (OpenAI, 2023b in their reference list) for the claim that GPT-4 is an effective discriminator, in the section introducing their use of GPT-4 to rate task exposure.2023-03-17 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Eloundou et al., GPTs are GPTs (2023): document page →
Discusses · 1
Concepts explicitly discussed. No earliest use, invention or transmission is claimed.
Not recorded for this document: explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.
What the document states
A limited selection of what this document states, each with its passage. It describes the text, not whether anyone acted on it.
What the document says it adds
The document’s own description of its contribution, quoted from the version each row names. A claim to be the first is the document’s claim; Selekoa does not assess it.