Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
The post “Six Dimensions of Operational Adequacy in AGI Projects” (2022-05-30) contests Y28. Introducing a list of properties a trustworthy AGI project would need, he says that no existing project qualifies. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source
Date 2022-05-30 · publication Claimed date 2017-11. Editor's note says the document was written in November 2017; the wording is attested only in the lightly edited copy published 2022-05-30. Role Contesting Register (kind of text) Nonfiction Engagement Engages a premise. Under the message-level rule, the post the passage belongs to gives a reason against the premise that a credible safety plan exists by diagnosing inadequate alignment mindset and safety approaches at named leading projects. Scope and limits Premise addressed: A credible safety plan exists. Read with the whole post, the reason given is its diagnosis of inadequate alignment mindset and safety approaches at named leading projects; it does not refute the premise that the most advanced projects are the most competent. Dated by its publication on 2022-05-30. The post's editor's note says it is a lightly edited copy of a document written in November 2017; that drafting date is claimed, and the quoted wording is attested only in the edited copy.
The evidence 01 primary source Supports the claim
Six Dimensions of Operational Adequacy in AGI Projects ↗ LessWrong · 2022-05-30
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “if a researcher on this Earth currently wishes to contribute to the common good, there are literally zero projects they can join and no project close to being joinable.” Location in source paragraph beginning 'I've sometimes been known to complain'
Machine-checked · 2026-10-06
Source details and check notes Authors Eliezer Yudkowsky Version Post body retrieved through the LessWrong GraphQL API on 2026-10-06 (SHA-256 30f88ccb952602dd97747a4ce6188fd120a8b51ce44b8acc73f80411f634f223), content version 1.1.1; quotations also compared with the posting-day version 1.0.0. Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-10-06 Language English (en) Attribution Eliezer Yudkowsky, “Six Dimensions of Operational Adequacy in AGI Projects”, LessWrong, 2022-05-30. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Bibliographic metadata, editorial paraphrases and short attributed quotations (at most 50 words each). Recheck terms before wider redistribution. Check notes Candidate pack passage T28-c. The quotation (29 words) matched the retrieved expression (SHA-256 30f88ccb952602dd97747a4ce6188fd120a8b51ce44b8acc73f80411f634f223) when checked on 2026-10-06. It also matched the posting-day version 1.0.0. Pack version note: edited post, current version 1.1.1; posting-day check pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A passage of the document disputes the proposition or a premise it depends on. The record documents the text’s position, not who is right.
Date. LessWrong postedAt.
Record ID yk-y28-lw-2022-six-dimensions-of-operational-adequacy-in-c