Records found and checked by machines, not reviewed by an editor · What this means →

Document · Research paper

Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code

Work-level record. Its arXiv versions and any conference or journal version are listed as sources, each with its own date. A citation to the work does not identify which version the citing author read.

Issued by
No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
Authors credited
Alec Radford · Bob McGrew · Dario Amodei · Greg Brockman · Igor Babuschkin · Ilya Sutskever · Jan Leike · Jared Kaplan · Joshua Achiam · Łukasz Kaiser · Mark Chen · Miles Brundage · Mira Murati · Nicholas Joseph · Pamela Mishkin · Sam McCandlish · Scott Gray · Wojciech Zaremba
Dates
Exact source
  • Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code (arXiv:2107.03374v1) arXiv · published 2021-07-07 · Dated document, retrieved on 2026-10-15 (SHA-256 7085950bcce34fee8ee1821ed1ac0c2672e13708ec866810f997c0bf467d5009) directly from the publisher. The author list is the byline as printed on the first page, read for the key papers pack on 2026-10-28.
  • Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code arXiv · published 2021-07-07 · arXiv abstract page, retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-28 (SHA-256 6146efca3f74a7b080925557c49653351071d47afed54a9689160c1d426b5ac6). Submission history as arXiv records it (UTC): v1 7 July 2021; v2 14 July 2021. The page serves the latest version; each version is a separate expression, and only the one a record names was read.

Appears in

No collection holds a record about this document yet.

Versions

No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.

Issue and authorship records

Documentary relations

Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.

Cites · 5

Explicit references in this document. Citation is neither agreement nor influence.

Cited by · 16

Recorded documents that explicitly reference this one. A citation to a work does not identify which version was read.

Not recorded for this document: explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.

What the document says it adds

The document’s own description of its contribution, quoted from the version each row names. A claim to be the first is the document’s claim; Selekoa does not assess it.