AI risk ≠ AGI risk
A blog post by Gary Marcus, Marcus on AI, dated 28 March 2023. datePublished metadata of the post.
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Gary Marcus.
- Dates
- No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 2023-03-28.
- Exact source
- AI risk ≠ AGI risk Marcus on AI, author's Substack (garymarcus.substack.com) · published 2023-03-28 · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-29 (SHA-256 5ab3a54e0f2b5e20368a619bcd0dde481432d904f94c0dcc2e985bc5d153fd03). Current Substack post, datePublished 2023-03-28; embedded tweets and a quoted Europol excerpt are not the author's text and are not quoted. The cross-family check retrieved it again on 2026-10-31; the bytes differ, and the check compared the quoted passages.
Appears in
- Arguments about catastrophic risk from advanced AI →2 records on this document
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Articulates · 1
Propositions whose criterion a passage of this document meets. The record says what the text states, in its register; it is not evidence that the proposition is true.
- Catastrophic risk from misuseMarcus's post of 28 March 2023 states that in the near term he is worried less about superintelligent machines beyond human control than about unreliable but widely deployed AI, that criminals and terrorists using it could contribute to nuclear war or the deliberate spread of pathogens, and that people need to stop worrying only about takeover scenarios and think more about such misuse.2023-03-28 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Catastrophic risk from misuse: propositions page →
Contests · 1
Propositions a passage of this document disputes, or a premise they depend on.
- Present harms deserve priorityMarcus's post of 28 March 2023 argues that the choice between present and future AI risks is not either/or, and that criticising people for focusing on the wrong risks does not help.2023-03-28 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Present harms deserve priority: propositions page →
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.