Re: Hugo de Garis
A blog post by Eliezer S. Yudkowsky, Extropians mailing list archive, dated 22 June 2000. Message header in the hypermail archive: Thu Jun 22 2000 - 12:13:13 MDT.
- Issued by
- No issuing record yet. A missing record is a gap in coverage.
- Authors credited
- No authorship claim recorded yet. The source record lists Eliezer S. Yudkowsky.
- Dates
- No date claim recorded yet. The source record gives the publication date as 2000-06-22.
- Exact source
- Re: Hugo de Garis Extropians mailing list archive (hypermail copy at diyhpl.us) · published 2000-06-22 · Retrieved for the candidate pack on 2026-10-31 (SHA-256 6e2060ae4c42774209d7ec73411550a3ec329decd2f17a151e4639d5400edca6). Hypermail archive page of the message dated Thu Jun 22 2000 12:13:13 MDT; retrieved with a plain curl user agent.
Appears in
- Machine succession, scale and acceleration: propositions in located texts, 1979–2026 →1 record on this document
Versions
No other versions of this document are recorded. The evidence applies to the source version listed above. Other versions, such as a preprint, working paper or journal publication, are not identified or substituted.
Documentary relations
Each relation is listed separately. Citing, crediting and reporting the use of a method are different acts, and none of them shows agreement or influence by itself.
Contests · 1
Propositions a passage of this document disputes, or a premise they depend on.
- Conflict over building superhuman machinesYudkowsky's Extropians list message of 22 June 2000, replying to a notice of a documentary on de Garis's "Gigadeath Artilect War", states that the projection of "Cosmists versus Terrans" is utterly unrealistic.2000-06-22 · publication · Stated in source · Supported Inspect claim & evidence ↗Conflict over building superhuman machines: propositions page →
Not recorded for this document: cites · cited by · explicitly credits · reports using a method from · method reported as used by · applies parts of · parts applied by · discusses · reports evaluation of. A missing record does not show that the relation does not exist.