Choose an institution to see its records and dossier, or choose a topic.
Through year 2027 · all records, including scheduled dates 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2008 2005 1965 Show Organisations and infrastructure All types Organisation Person Document Concept Infrastructure Public body Reset filters
94 people, organisations and other records · 122 relationships · 34 claims about a valueEverything recorded up to the chosen year, whether or not still in effect · Undated records included
Claim and evidence Close ×
Anthropic's Responsible Scaling Policy v3.0 says it uses 'catastrophic risk' in its plain meaning rather than adopting any specific statutory definition. It adds that where laws such as California SB 53 define this or similar terms with specific thresholds, Anthropic addresses those requirements in separate compliance frameworks. Copy claim link
Copy claim reference
Machine-checked, not reviewed by an editor Stated in source Supported
Supporting evidence: primary · 1 source; Context: primary · 1 source
Subject version v3.0 · Published 2026-02-24 · Effective 2026-02-24 Object version Chaptered (Stats. 2025, ch. 138) · Published 2025-09-29 · Effective 2026-01-01 Date 2026-02-24 · effective Scope and limits The edition’s own statement about SB 53, quoted from it. It is not evidence that the edition satisfies the statute, that its publisher is a frontier developer under it, or of implementation or compliance. This is an explicit link that separates the RSP from Anthropic's SB 53 compliance documents. The footnote does not name the Frontier Compliance Framework or any other specific document. Paraphrase of the Introduction's body: the RSP may serve some regulatory requirements but is not designed to be comprehensive, and regulatory requirements that exceed or differ from it will be addressed through separate documents. On 2026-10-04 a whitespace-normalised text search of the live PDFs found the same footnote sentence once each in v3.1, v3.2, v3.3 and v3.4. This record covers v3.0 only; no per-edition records are created here. The record makes no claim about whether any compliance document satisfies SB 53.
The evidence 03 primary source Supports the claim
Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.0 ↗ Anthropic · 2026-02-24
Archived copy, captured 2026-02-24: Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.0 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Source excerpt “Where laws such as California SB 53 define this or similar terms with specific thresholds, we address those requirements in separate compliance frameworks.” Location in source Footnote 1 (Introduction), PDF p. 4
Machine-checked · 2026-10-04
Source details and check notes Authors Anthropic Version Responsible Scaling Policy v3.0; effective date 2026-02-24. Version date 2026-02-24 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-18 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2026-02-24: Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.0 ↗ . Captured on the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-02-24. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.Attribution Anthropic, Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.0. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Verbatim excerpt proposed by a research agent and checked by two independent fresh-context verifier agents and decided by a third adjudicating agent on 2026-10-04; re-matched mechanically by the integrator against a direct fetch of the cited expression. Matched against the pdftotext extraction of the live v3.0 PDF. The cited capture is of the CDN PDF the canonical URL redirects to. Its CDX digest (4ZYFQ5TXKJPSRX3JWWPF7NGCFTCUMGQX) is identical to the live file's. The dataset's existing capture of the canonical URL, 20260224203046, is a 307 redirect record pointing to this file. Human editorial review is pending. primary source Supports the claim
Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.0 ↗ Anthropic · 2026-02-24
Archived copy, captured 2026-02-24: Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.0 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase the footnote explains that the RSP uses 'catastrophic risk' broadly, for the most severe potential harms from advanced AI, and in its plain meaning, without adopting any specific statutory definition.
Location in source Footnote 1 (Introduction), PDF p. 4, sentences preceding the quoted one
Machine-checked · 2026-10-04
Source details and check notes Authors Anthropic Version Responsible Scaling Policy v3.0; effective date 2026-02-24. Version date 2026-02-24 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-18 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2026-02-24: Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.0 ↗ . Captured on the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-02-24. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.Attribution Anthropic, Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.0. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Editorial paraphrase proposed by a research agent and checked by two independent fresh-context verifier agents and decided by a third adjudicating agent on 2026-10-04. Paraphrased to stay within the per-document quotation budget. Human editorial review is pending. primary source Context only
Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.4 ↗ Anthropic · Publication date unknown
Archived copy, captured 2026-07-10: Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.4 ↗
Copy source reference
Cite the original source Cite the original document, not Selekoa. Check these details against it.
Copy APA
Download BibTeX Download RIS Download CSL-JSON
Paraphrase v3.4 carries the same footnote, including the statement that statutory definitions of the SB 53 kind are addressed in separate compliance frameworks.
Location in source Footnote 1 (Introduction), PDF p. 4
Machine-checked · 2026-10-04
Source details and check notes Authors Anthropic Version Responsible Scaling Policy v3.4; effective date 2026-07-08. Version date 2026-07-08 Canonical address Open the canonical source ↗ Accessed 2026-09-18 Language English (en) Archive copy Open archived copy, captured 2026-07-10: Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.4 ↗ . Captured 2 days after the recorded version date. An archive copy shows only what the archive retrieved on 2026-07-10. It does not prove what the page said earlier, and it can differ from the copy checked on 2026-09-18.Attribution Anthropic, Responsible Scaling Policy — v3.4. Reuse No open redistribution licence asserted. Selekoa practice: metadata, attributed paraphrases and short attributed quotations under the editorial policy (at most 50 words each; at most 400 quoted words per document across the dataset, and about 10% of a document under about 2,000 words). Documents are linked externally, not redistributed. Publisher terms that forbid quotation override this practice. Check notes Editorial paraphrase proposed by a research agent and checked by two independent fresh-context verifier agents and decided by a third adjudicating agent on 2026-10-04. Shows that the sentence persists in later editions. On 2026-10-04 the same normalised search found it once each in v3.1, v3.2 and v3.3 at the dataset URLs. The capture's CDX digest (BOWNZBCA5KLOMKUHM3MZ5PQ5J3VG2XZ2) is identical to the live file's. Human editorial review is pending. Status and meaning Editorial status. Not reviewed by an editor . An exploratory record that no editor has accepted. This status does not say whether a person has read any linked passage. Each evidence record above shows how it was checked.
Relation. A framework or company document explicitly presents itself as fulfilling, implementing, responding to or prepared under a commitment or legal obligation, in its own words. The link is the document’s statement; it is not evidence of compliance.
Date. Effective date printed on the cover of RSP v3.0 ('Effective February 24, 2026'). The dataset also uses it as the publication date.
Record ID sb-link-rsp-v3-0