Arguments about AI and biological risk

Which located texts, from 2023 to 2026, state, contest or bear on the published arguments about AI and biological risk: whether current systems already help an actor seeking biological harm, where the binding barrier lies, what published evaluations establish, whether design tools are a distinct case, whether synthesis screening is the control point, whether open weights raise the risk, and whom assessment must cover? For each proposition, which text is the earliest located?

Each row is one text’s stance on one proposition, as a stored record states it: articulates, contests or bears on. A stance belongs to the text, not to its author. Rows are in date order, which records no influence between texts. Authors appear as the texts’ own bylines print them, pseudonyms included. “Earliest located” marks only a text the collection’s records name as the earliest the searches found.

Read the collection, with passages and headlines →