Arguments about catastrophic risk from advanced AI

Which published texts, from 2000 to 2026, state, contest or bear on the arguments that advanced AI could cause catastrophe or human extinction, and on the arguments that the risk is lower, later, placed elsewhere or better handled otherwise? Which texts answer one another? For each proposition, which text is the earliest located?

Each row is one text’s stance on one proposition, as a stored record states it: articulates, contests or bears on. A stance belongs to the text, not to its author. Rows are in date order, which records no influence between texts. Authors appear as the texts’ own bylines print them, pseudonyms included. “Earliest located” marks only a text the collection’s records name as the earliest the searches found.

Read the collection, with passages and headlines →