2024: governance
Selekoa’s 251 governance records dated 2024, in date order, of 407 in all topics.
Selective: what the records hold, not a history of the year.
How this page is made
- Each record keeps the kind of date its source gives: an event, a publication, an announcement, an effective date, a revision, a signature, a snapshot, or the start or end of an interval. A snapshot is one dated report of a state.
- A record dated only to a month sits under that month, before the records dated to a day. A record dated only to the year sits under the year, before the months. No day or month is added.
- An announcement records what a party stated. It does not show that anything was done, built or paid for.
- Dates a party states for a year are listed apart, after the records: targets, deadlines and terms, and dates stated in passing, such as a reported start of operation. So is a record’s own date that falls after its sources were last checked, such as a law’s date of effect. A stated date given only in words, with no year, is not listed.
- Records with an unknown date are not listed. A record with an interval appears in the year it starts and in the year it ends, or once, with both dates, when both fall in one year.
- Each provision of a text is a record of its own. Provisions sharing a text and a date are shown here as one entry, with their number, and listed on the text’s page; a contested or unresolved one is listed here on its own. The counts on this page include each provision record.
- The page is generated from the records, with no selection or framing by an editor. Coverage is uneven across years and topics: a year or topic with few records may be one the records barely cover.
Governance 251 records
Dated to 2024 only
· snapshot · dated to the year
The Form 990 for tax year 2024 filed as “OpenAI Foundation fka OpenAI Inc” lists OpenAI Global LLC (with a disregarded single-member LLC) as a related organisation taxable as a partnership whose direct controlling entity is OpenAI GP LLC, and lists OpenAI GP LLC as a disregarded entity whose direct controlling entity is OpenAI Foundation. Evidence ↗· snapshot · dated to the year
OpenAI, Inc. reports on its Form 990 for tax year 2024 that it is a corporation exempt under section 501(c)(3), formed in 2015, with Delaware as its state of legal domicile. The return is filed under the name “OpenAI Foundation fka OpenAI Inc”, and its Schedule O states that OpenAI Inc. changed its name to OpenAI Foundation as of 28 October 2025. Evidence ↗
January 2024
· publication · dated to the day
RAND’s red-team study states that it found no statistically significant difference in the viability of the plans produced by its red cells with or without large language model assistance, for the two models and the twelve cells of its main comparison. Evidence ↗The Operational Risks of AI in Large-Scale Biological Attacks: Results of a Red-Team Study →Claim page →
· publication · dated to the day
RAND published 'The Operational Risks of AI in Large-Scale Biological Attacks: Results of a Red-Team Study' (RR-A2977-2) on 25 January 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
2 provision records of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Anthropic, PBC (filed 2024-01-29)
March 2024
· snapshot · dated to the day
OpenAI announced on 8 March 2024 that Sam Altman, as CEO, would rejoin the OpenAI board of directors. Evidence ↗· snapshot · dated to the day
OpenAI announced on 8 March 2024 that Fidji Simo, CEO and Chair of Instacart, was one of three new members of its board of directors. Evidence ↗· snapshot · dated to the day
OpenAI announced on 8 March 2024 that Nicole Seligman, former EVP and General Counsel at Sony Corporation, was one of three new members of its board of directors. Evidence ↗· snapshot · dated to the day
OpenAI announced on 8 March 2024 that Sue Desmond-Hellmann was one of three new members of its board of directors. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Baidu's annual report on Form 20-F, filed on 15 March 2024, states that Baidu completed the security assessment and algorithm filing required under the Generative AI Services Measures and other applicable rules before launching ERNIE Bot to the public. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
xAI announced release of Grok-1 base weights and architecture under Apache 2.0. Evidence ↗
April 2024
· interval ends · dated to the month
Paul Christiano was named by Anthropic on 19 September 2023 as one of the five initial Trustees of its Long-Term Benefit Trust; Anthropic’s page later states that he stepped down in April 2024 to take a role as Head of AI Safety at the U.S. AI Safety Institute. Evidence ↗· announcement · dated to the day
A GOV.UK press release of 2 April 2024 announces that the UK and US signed a Memorandum of Understanding, on 1 April 2024 as the release states, to work together on developing tests for the most advanced AI models, signed by Michelle Donelan and Gina Raimondo as Technology Secretary and US Commerce Secretary. Evidence ↗· announcement · dated to the day
On 3 April 2024 the CAC published an announcement of filed generative AI services under the Interim Measures, stating that further locally filed services would be summarised and updated on its website without further announcements, and that online generative AI applications must display the filed service used, with model name and filing number. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
The Office of Science and Technology Policy released the Framework for Nucleic Acid Synthesis Screening on 29 April 2024, and the copy served from the Biden White House archive on 28 October 2026 is marked as revised in September 2024, with April 2024 given as version 1. Evidence ↗
May 2024
· publication · dated to the day
The WMDP benchmark paper states that it publicly releases a dataset of 3,668 multiple-choice questions serving as a proxy measurement of hazardous knowledge in biosecurity, cybersecurity and chemical security, developed by a consortium of academics and technical consultants and filtered to remove sensitive information before release. Evidence ↗The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearning (arXiv:2403.03218) →Claim page →
· event · dated to the day
Google DeepMind introduced its initial Frontier Safety Framework. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
25 provision records of Frontier Safety Framework (2024)
· publication · dated to the day
The UK institute's May 2024 evaluations update states that several of the five publicly available large language models it tested demonstrated expert-level knowledge of chemistry and biology, answering over 600 private expert-written chemistry and biology questions at levels similar to humans with PhD-level training. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
The UK institute, then named the AI Safety Institute, published 'Advanced AI evaluations at AISI: May update' on 20 May 2024, stating that it had tested leading AI models for cyber, chemical, biological and agent capabilities and for safeguard effectiveness. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Amazon is listed among the sixteen organisations that, according to the GOV.UK text of 21 May 2024, the UK and Republic of Korea governments announced had agreed to the Frontier AI Safety Commitments. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Anthropic is listed among the sixteen organisations that, according to the GOV.UK text of 21 May 2024, the UK and Republic of Korea governments announced had agreed to the Frontier AI Safety Commitments. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Cohere is listed among the sixteen organisations that, according to the GOV.UK text of 21 May 2024, the UK and Republic of Korea governments announced had agreed to the Frontier AI Safety Commitments. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
G42 is listed among the sixteen organisations that, according to the GOV.UK text of 21 May 2024, the UK and Republic of Korea governments announced had agreed to the Frontier AI Safety Commitments. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Google is listed, as “Google”, among the sixteen organisations that, according to the GOV.UK text of 21 May 2024, the UK and Republic of Korea governments announced had agreed to the Frontier AI Safety Commitments. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
IBM is listed among the sixteen organisations that, according to the GOV.UK text of 21 May 2024, the UK and Republic of Korea governments announced had agreed to the Frontier AI Safety Commitments. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Inflection AI is listed among the sixteen organisations that, according to the GOV.UK text of 21 May 2024, the UK and Republic of Korea governments announced had agreed to the Frontier AI Safety Commitments. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Meta is listed among the sixteen organisations that, according to the GOV.UK text of 21 May 2024, the UK and Republic of Korea governments announced had agreed to the Frontier AI Safety Commitments. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Microsoft is listed among the sixteen organisations that, according to the GOV.UK text of 21 May 2024, the UK and Republic of Korea governments announced had agreed to the Frontier AI Safety Commitments. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Mistral AI is listed among the sixteen organisations that, according to the GOV.UK text of 21 May 2024, the UK and Republic of Korea governments announced had agreed to the Frontier AI Safety Commitments. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Naver is listed among the sixteen organisations that, according to the GOV.UK text of 21 May 2024, the UK and Republic of Korea governments announced had agreed to the Frontier AI Safety Commitments. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
OpenAI is listed among the sixteen organisations that, according to the GOV.UK text of 21 May 2024, the UK and Republic of Korea governments announced had agreed to the Frontier AI Safety Commitments. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
The UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology published the Frontier AI Safety Commitments on GOV.UK on 21 May 2024, the opening day of the AI Seoul Summit, and updated the page on 7 February 2025 to add organisations to its list. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Samsung Electronics is listed among the sixteen organisations that, according to the GOV.UK text of 21 May 2024, the UK and Republic of Korea governments announced had agreed to the Frontier AI Safety Commitments. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Technology Innovation Institute is listed among the sixteen organisations that, according to the GOV.UK text of 21 May 2024, the UK and Republic of Korea governments announced had agreed to the Frontier AI Safety Commitments. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
xAI is listed among the sixteen organisations that, according to the GOV.UK text of 21 May 2024, the UK and Republic of Korea governments announced had agreed to the Frontier AI Safety Commitments. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Zhipu AI is listed, as “Zhipu.ai”, among the sixteen organisations that, according to the GOV.UK text of 21 May 2024, the UK and Republic of Korea governments announced had agreed to the Frontier AI Safety Commitments. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
The Seoul Declaration states that its participants continue to focus on supporting the operationalisation of the Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct for Organizations Developing Advanced AI Systems. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
The Seoul Declaration recognises the particular responsibility of organisations developing and deploying frontier AI and, in that regard, notes the Frontier AI Safety Commitments. Evidence ↗· snapshot · dated to the day
The Seoul Declaration opens as a statement of world leaders representing ten countries and the European Union (count made by Selekoa). Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology published the Seoul Declaration for safe, innovative and inclusive AI, with the annexed Statement of Intent on AI safety science, on GOV.UK on 21 May 2024. Evidence ↗· event · dated to the day
According to the author’s office, the California Senate passed SB 1047 by 32 votes to 1 on 21 May 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
5 provision records of Frontier AI Safety Commitments, AI Seoul Summit 2024
· snapshot · dated to the day
The Seoul Ministerial Statement is made in the names of the ministers of 27 countries and the representative of the European Union (count made by Selekoa); China is not among those named. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology published the Seoul Ministerial Statement for advancing AI safety, innovation and inclusivity on GOV.UK on 22 May 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
4 provision records of Seoul Ministerial Statement for advancing AI safety, innovation and inclusivity (22 May 2024)
· snapshot · dated to the day
OpenAI announced on 28 May 2024 that its board had formed a Safety and Security Committee to make recommendations to the full board on critical safety and security decisions. Evidence ↗· snapshot · dated to the day · announced
OpenAI announced on 28 May 2024 that its Safety and Security Committee would be led by four directors, with Bret Taylor as Chair. Evidence ↗· snapshot · dated to the day
Anthropic announced on 29 May 2024 that Jay Kreps had joined its board of directors and that he was appointed by its Long-Term Benefit Trust. Evidence ↗· event · dated to the day
Anthropic announced on 29 May 2024 that Luke Muehlhauser had decided to step down from its board of directors; Anthropic stated that he would focus on his work at Open Philanthropy. Evidence ↗
June 2024
· signature · dated to the day
The European Parliament and the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the Artificial Intelligence Act, which is dated 13 June 2024 and was published in the Official Journal on 12 July 2024. Evidence ↗· snapshot · dated to the day
OpenAI announced on 13 June 2024 that Paul M. Nakasone had joined its board of directors. Evidence ↗· snapshot · dated to the day · announced
OpenAI announced on 13 June 2024 that Paul M. Nakasone would join the board’s Safety and Security Committee. Evidence ↗
July 2024
· publication · dated to the month
The U.S. AI Safety Institute issued the initial public draft of NIST AI 800-1, "Managing Misuse Risk for Dual-Use Foundation Models", dated July 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
The NDRC, MIIT, NEA and National Data Administration issued the Special Action Plan for the Green and Low-Carbon Development of Data Centres under document number 发改环资〔2024〕970号, dated 3 July 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
1 provision record of Special Action Plan for the Green and Low-Carbon Development of Data Centres (数据中心绿色低碳发展专项行动计划)
· publication · dated to the day
37 provision records of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act), as published in the Official Journal
· publication · dated to the day
1 provision record of The King's Speech 2024
· publication · dated to the day
Meta published Zuckerberg’s argument for an open-model ecosystem. Evidence ↗
August 2024
· effective · dated to the day
1 provision record of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act), as published in the Official Journal
· publication · dated to the day
METR published its preliminary GPT-4o evaluation report. Evidence ↗· snapshot · dated to the day
OpenAI announced on 8 August 2024 the appointment of Zico Kolter to its board of directors. Evidence ↗· event · dated to the day
According to the author’s office, the California State Assembly passed SB 1047 by 49 votes to 15 on 28 August 2024, returning it to the Senate. Evidence ↗· announcement · dated to the day · announced
On 29 August 2024 NIST announced that the U.S. AI Safety Institute had agreements (a Memorandum of Understanding with each company) enabling collaboration on AI safety research, testing and evaluation with Anthropic, including access to major new models before and after public release. Evidence ↗· announcement · dated to the day · announced
On 29 August 2024 NIST announced that the U.S. AI Safety Institute had agreements (a Memorandum of Understanding with each company) enabling collaboration on AI safety research, testing and evaluation with OpenAI, including access to major new models before and after public release. Evidence ↗· event · dated to the day
According to the author’s office, the California Senate passed SB 1047 by 29 votes to 9 on 29 August 2024, sending it to the Governor. Evidence ↗
September 2024
· revision · dated to the month
The Framework for Nucleic Acid Synthesis Screening states that the committee that produced it was established in 2023 to develop a framework for nucleic acid synthesis screening pursuant to section 4.4(b)(i) of Executive Order 14110. Evidence ↗Framework for Nucleic Acid Synthesis Screening →Claim page →
· revision · dated to the month
5 provision records of Framework for Nucleic Acid Synthesis Screening
· publication · dated to the day
TC260 (全国网络安全标准化技术委员会) released version 1.0 of the AI Safety Governance Framework on 9 September 2024 at the main forum of the 2024 National Cybersecurity Awareness Week. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
5 provision records of AI Safety Governance Framework, version 1.0 (人工智能安全治理框架 V1.0)
· publication · dated to the day
The Bureau of Industry and Security published a proposed rule, with request for comment, establishing reporting requirements for the development of advanced AI models and computing clusters under Executive Order 14110, in the Federal Register of 11 September 2024, with comments due by 11 October 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
1 provision record of Establishment of Reporting Requirements for the Development of Advanced Artificial Intelligence Models and Computing Clusters (proposed rule)
· publication · dated to the day
METR published its preliminary o1-preview evaluation report. Evidence ↗· snapshot · dated to the day · announced
OpenAI announced on 16 September 2024 that the Safety and Security Committee would become an independent board oversight committee chaired by Zico Kolter. Evidence ↗· event · dated to the day
The Governor of California returned SB 1047 to the Senate without his signature by a veto message dated 29 September 2024. Evidence ↗
October 2024
· publication · dated to the day
The UK screening guidance on synthetic nucleic acids for users and providers was published on GOV.UK on 8 October 2024, described there as guidance for users and providers involved in the provision, use and transfer of synthetic nucleic acids and of benchtop equipment that synthesises nucleic acids in the UK. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
6 provision records of UK screening guidance on synthetic nucleic acids for users and providers
· effective · dated to the day
Anthropic’s Responsible Scaling Policy v2.0 states that the policy also helps satisfy Anthropic’s Frontier AI Safety Commitments (2024). Evidence ↗· effective · dated to the day
Anthropic’s Responsible Scaling Policy v2.0 states that the policy also helps satisfy Anthropic’s Voluntary White House Commitments (2023). Evidence ↗· effective · dated to the day
Anthropic published Responsible Scaling Policy v2.0, identified by its effective date of 2024-10-15. Evidence ↗· effective · dated to the day
34 provision records of Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy — v2.0
· effective · dated to the day UnresolvedQuestion posed by Selekoa
Did RSP v2.0’s changes to threshold and mitigation specification reduce the verifiability of Anthropic’s safety commitments relative to v1.0? Evidence ↗· effective · dated to the day
RSP v2.0 changes “ASL” to refer to groups of safeguards, rather than also referring to models. Evidence ↗· effective · dated to the day
Responsible Scaling Policy v2.0 replaces v1.0 in the publisher’s documented framework version sequence. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
The White House issued the national security memorandum on advancing United States leadership in artificial intelligence, harnessing AI for national security objectives and fostering AI safety, security and trustworthiness, posted on its briefing-room page under the date 24 October 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
The national security memorandum of 24 October 2024 states in its first section that it fulfils the directive set out in subsection 4.8 of Executive Order 14110. Evidence ↗Memorandum on Advancing the United States' Leadership in Artificial Intelligence; Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Fulfill National Security Objectives; and Fostering the Safety, Security, and Trustworthiness of Artificial Intelligence →Claim page →
· publication · dated to the day
5 provision records of Memorandum on Advancing the United States' Leadership in Artificial Intelligence; Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Fulfill National Security Objectives; and Fostering the Safety, Security, and Trustworthiness of Artificial Intelligence
November 2024
· publication · dated to the day
FERC, by order issued on 1 November 2024 (189 FERC ¶ 61,078, Docket ER24-2172), rejected the amended Interconnection Service Agreement among PJM, Susquehanna Nuclear and PPL Electric Utilities, which would have increased the co-located load at the Susquehanna plant from 300 MW to 480 MW. World Nuclear News reported the rejection on 4 November 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
The European Commission published the initial draft of the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice on 14 November 2024. The draft is presented by the Chairs and Vice-Chairs of the four working groups, who invited written feedback from Plenary participants and observers by Thursday, 28 November, 12:00 CET. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
4 provision records of General-Purpose AI Code of Practice, initial draft (14 November 2024)
· publication · dated to the day · reported as performed
NIST states that US AISI and UK AISI conducted a joint pre-deployment evaluation of Anthropic's upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet, with biological capabilities among the four domains tested, and that the findings were shared with Anthropic before public release. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
The joint pre-deployment evaluation summary for Anthropic's upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet states that US AISI evaluated the model on a set of multiple-choice biology research task questions and that its performance was comparable to the reference models and significantly below measured human expert baselines in most instances. Evidence ↗US–UK AISI evaluation of Claude 3.5 Sonnet (2024) →Claim page →
· publication · dated to the day
The joint pre-deployment evaluation summary for the upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet states that US AISI piloted an evaluation method that augments the model with access to bioinformatic tools, and that when tested with Sonnet 3.5 this resulted in increased performance beyond the model alone, at times exceeding measured human expert baselines. Evidence ↗US–UK AISI evaluation of Claude 3.5 Sonnet (2024) →Claim page →
· publication · dated to the day
On 19 November 2024 NIST published a summary of a joint US AISI–UK AISI pre-deployment evaluation of Anthropic’s upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet, stating that findings were shared with Anthropic before public release. Evidence ↗· revision · dated to the day
The Llama 3 paper states that its uplift testing for chemical and biological weapons found no significant uplift in performance related to use of the Llama 3 model, both in an aggregate comparison with a web-only control condition and in its subgroup breakdowns. Evidence ↗· revision · dated to the day
The Llama 3 authors at Meta published 'The Llama 3 Herd of Models' as arXiv:2407.21783, first submitted on 31 July 2024, with the version read here submitted on 23 November 2024. Evidence ↗· revision · dated to the day
The Llama 3 paper states that, after validating its uplift results with CBRNE subject matter experts, it assesses that there is a low risk that release of the Llama 3 models will increase ecosystem risk related to biological or chemical weapon attacks. Evidence ↗
December 2024
· publication · dated to the month
The Artificial Intelligence Industry Alliance (AIIA) drafted and issued the Artificial Intelligence Safety Commitments (人工智能安全承诺), a text dated December 2024 whose full text CAICT posted on 24 December 2024. Evidence ↗Artificial Intelligence Industry Alliance (AIIA) / 中国人工智能产业发展联盟 →Claim page →
· publication · dated to the month
3 provision records of Artificial Intelligence Safety Commitments (人工智能安全承诺), December 2024
· publication · dated to the day
1 provision record of MOFCOM Announcement No. 46 of 2024 on strengthening export controls on related dual-use items to the United States (商务部公告2024年第46号)
· publication · dated to the day
The o1 System Card states that its evaluations found o1 can help experts with the operational planning of reproducing a known biological threat, which it says meets OpenAI's medium risk threshold, and that the Safety Advisory Group classified the pre-mitigation model as medium risk for CBRN. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
The o1 System Card states that OpenAI's Preparedness evaluations cover four risk categories, one of which is CBRN (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear), and that o1 was evaluated in accordance with the Preparedness Framework. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
The o1 System Card states that the models do not enable non-experts to create biological threats, because creating such a threat requires hands-on laboratory skills that the models cannot replace. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
The Bureau of Industry and Security published the interim final rule "Foreign-Produced Direct Product Rule Additions, and Refinements to Controls for Advanced Computing and Semiconductor Manufacturing Items" in the Federal Register of 5 December 2024, effective 2 December 2024. Evidence ↗· event · dated to the day
The o1 System Card lists deceptive alignment among categories covered by external red teamers. Evidence ↗· event · dated to the day
OpenAI published the o1 System Card version labelled updated December 5, 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
1 provision record of Foreign-Produced Direct Product Rule Additions, and Refinements to Controls for Advanced Computing and Semiconductor Manufacturing Items (interim final rule)
· publication · dated to the day
The joint pre-deployment evaluation summary for OpenAI's o1 states that US AISI found the model's performance on a set of multiple-choice biology research task questions to be generally comparable to the best-performing reference models tested across an array of question sets. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day · reported as performed
NIST states that US AISI and UK AISI conducted a joint pre-deployment evaluation of OpenAI's o1 across three domains including biological capabilities, and OpenAI's own system card states that pre-deployment evaluations by the two institutes were conducted on a version of o1 and are not included in the card. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
On 18 December 2024 NIST published a summary of a joint US AISI–UK AISI pre-deployment evaluation of OpenAI’s o1, stating that findings were shared with OpenAI before public release. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Alibaba is listed, as 阿里巴巴（中国）有限公司, among the 17 companies on the initial signatory list (首批签署企业名单) of the AIIA AI Safety Commitments posted by CAICT on 24 December 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Ant Group is listed, as 蚂蚁科技集团股份有限公司, among the 17 companies on the initial signatory list (首批签署企业名单) of the AIIA AI Safety Commitments posted by CAICT on 24 December 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Baidu is listed, as 北京百度网讯科技有限公司, among the 17 companies on the initial signatory list (首批签署企业名单) of the AIIA AI Safety Commitments posted by CAICT on 24 December 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
China Mobile is listed, as 中国移动通信集团有限公司, among the 17 companies on the initial signatory list (首批签署企业名单) of the AIIA AI Safety Commitments posted by CAICT on 24 December 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
China Telecom AI is listed, as 中电信人工智能科技有限公司, among the 17 companies on the initial signatory list (首批签署企业名单) of the AIIA AI Safety Commitments posted by CAICT on 24 December 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
DeepSeek is listed, as 北京深度求索人工智能基础技术研究有限公司, among the 17 companies on the initial signatory list (首批签署企业名单) of the AIIA AI Safety Commitments posted by CAICT on 24 December 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
4Paradigm is listed, as 第四范式（北京）技术有限公司, among the 17 companies on the initial signatory list (首批签署企业名单) of the AIIA AI Safety Commitments posted by CAICT on 24 December 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Huawei is listed, as 华为技术有限公司, among the 17 companies on the initial signatory list (首批签署企业名单) of the AIIA AI Safety Commitments posted by CAICT on 24 December 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
iFlytek is listed, as 科大讯飞股份有限公司, among the 17 companies on the initial signatory list (首批签署企业名单) of the AIIA AI Safety Commitments posted by CAICT on 24 December 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Megvii is listed, as 北京旷视科技有限公司, among the 17 companies on the initial signatory list (首批签署企业名单) of the AIIA AI Safety Commitments posted by CAICT on 24 December 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
MiniMax is listed, as 上海稀宇科技有限公司, among the 17 companies on the initial signatory list (首批签署企业名单) of the AIIA AI Safety Commitments posted by CAICT on 24 December 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
360 is listed, as 三六零安全科技股份有限公司, among the 17 companies on the initial signatory list (首批签署企业名单) of the AIIA AI Safety Commitments posted by CAICT on 24 December 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
SenseTime is listed, as 上海商汤智能科技有限公司, among the 17 companies on the initial signatory list (首批签署企业名单) of the AIIA AI Safety Commitments posted by CAICT on 24 December 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Tencent is listed, as 深圳市腾讯计算机系统有限公司, among the 17 companies on the initial signatory list (首批签署企业名单) of the AIIA AI Safety Commitments posted by CAICT on 24 December 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Volcano Engine is listed, as 北京火山引擎科技有限公司, among the 17 companies on the initial signatory list (首批签署企业名单) of the AIIA AI Safety Commitments posted by CAICT on 24 December 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
01.AI is listed, as 北京零一万物科技有限公司, among the 17 companies on the initial signatory list (首批签署企业名单) of the AIIA AI Safety Commitments posted by CAICT on 24 December 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
Zhipu AI is listed, as 北京智谱华章科技有限公司, among the 17 companies on the initial signatory list (首批签署企业名单) of the AIIA AI Safety Commitments posted by CAICT on 24 December 2024. Evidence ↗· publication · dated to the day
OpenAI published “Why OpenAI’s structure must evolve to advance our mission” on 27 December 2024. It said its board was evaluating the corporate structure and described a plan to transform its existing for-profit into a Delaware public benefit corporation that would run and control OpenAI’s operations and business, while the nonprofit would hire a leadership team and staff to pursue charitable initiatives. Evidence ↗